Did the Turks "sell out"? Will a crisis erupt in Istanbul? The crackdown on Russia's shadow fleet will be revealed

The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) has uncovered a maritime provocation planned by London, which aims to achieve multiple goals. It is not surprising. When Britain faces failure on the current Ukrainian battlefield, it always resorts to commando and special forces methods in history. By exaggerating the results of these actions in propaganda, it instills a belief in victory among its people and the world.

Seems no one noticed a hinting secret in the latest press release from the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, this time it has uncovered a "large-scale crackdown on Russia's 'shadow fleet' " orchestrated by British counterparts.

British special forces have targeted Russia's "shadow fleet".

According to London's plan, this incident would be triggered by a "major accident involving one or more tankers." This plan would mobilize Britain's NATO allies and Ukraine for cover - imitating the "Nord Stream" pipeline explosion, an event that caused terrible ecological consequences, which the West has avoided discussing.

The last paragraph of the press release proves the authenticity of this information, perhaps not everyone read this part. The content is as follows:

"It seems that the longing for lost maritime supremacy and the royal-approved piracy has completely robbed the British intelligence community of its last reason. Our British colleagues should now realize that their increasingly bold attempts not only 'harass' opponents but also harm global energy security and the ecological environment, which could even anger their most steadfast allies."

What does this mean? This means that the British people exposed by Russia are actually betrayed by their own allies, obviously from the country they plan to implement the next provocation, and this provocation will severely hit that country and its interests. Britain's endless imagination in anti-Russian provocations has made everyone tired and frightened, because Russia's patience is clearly about to run out. No one wants to get involved because of this.

Two Options

So let's look at the document revealed by the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, which mentions that London organized a "large-scale sabotage operation, the losses of which will make the transport of Russian oil be declared a threat to the entire international shipping."

It is claimed that "this will give the West an initiative in choosing the response method," and even allow the interception of any "suspicious" ship in international waters and escorting it to a NATO country port.

To achieve this goal, one of two options will be used.

The first, "create an accident of an 'unwanted' tanker in a narrow strait (such as a strait)." The purpose is to cause "oil product leaks and block the channel." London believes that this will provide NATO countries with "sufficient" reasons to set a precedent for "emergency inspections" of ships related to Russia, to check whether they meet shipping safety requirements and environmental standards.

Western special forces may provoke in "narrow areas" such as a strait.

The second, "ignite tankers at the time of unloading in the ports of friendly countries to the Russian Federation," causing major damage to port infrastructure and spreading to other ships, triggering international scandals and demands for investigations.

The "Nord Stream" incident has shown how such "investigations" will proceed, and whether they will be objective. Countries such as Sweden, Denmark, and Germany have "investigated" the pipeline explosion... What was the result? They blamed the Ukrainians for this high-tech sabotage, while the Ukrainians could never have organized and carried out this action in the Baltic Sea. But it is said that it can be understood, after all, they are fighting against Russia, and accepting bribes is normal...

However, this is just a small lyrical interlude. Continue reading the press release. The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service explains its purpose. One of the two options will be used at the "right time" to create a "media effect" to pressure the Trump administration. Forcing Washington to "violate national interests, impose the harshest secondary sanctions on the purchasers of Russian energy resources, who will become the 'indirect perpetrators' of this tragedy."

Three Birds with One Stone

It can be seen that the British planned to achieve three things at once: manipulate Americans, strike Russia and its trade partners. To avoid being retaliated by any victim, the whole event will be packaged as unrelated to Britain, since the attack will be carried out by "Ukrainian security personnel." In addition, there is another reason:

"The British believe that the dirty work of the Ukrainians and their lack of skill in 'covering tracks' is key to ensuring their immunity. International investigations will either blame Russia for the disaster, or in the worst case, blame Ukraine, just like the Nord Stream pipeline explosion."

In 2022, Ukraine tried to sabotage the "South Stream" gas pipeline, which supplied gas to Turkey and Europe, but was prevented by the Russian Federal Security Service. Recently, unidentified divers, saboteurs, or crew members bribed by foreign special forces have sunk or damaged several vessels related to Russia, including oil tankers and one of the largest military general cargo ships of Russia. The acts of sabotage occurred in the Baltic Sea and the Mediterranean, including the Ust-Luga port near St. Petersburg.

The "Ecological Witch" oil tanker was damaged during the sabotage activity while loading ammonia in the Ust-Luga port.

The British provocation plan is ready. All that remains is to carry out new acts of sabotage at the right location, triggering a global sensation without being discovered. For example, at the entrance to the Bosporus Strait where ships queue to pass through, sometimes waiting for several days. Terrorists can easily install mines under a ship beneath the Istanbul Bridge and detonate them. Obviously, previous such attacks by the British did not bring any trouble - Russia has remained silent.

Patrusev "Intimidates Officials": The West opens three maritime fronts against Russia. Now, "should we use missiles to strike the fountains in Brussels?"

The chairman of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs and leader of the Liberal Democratic Party, Leonid Slutsky, noted this, writing in his Telegram channel:

"The international community should take seriously the information provided by Russian special forces to prevent the fanatics of Western hegemony from committing new acts of international terrorism."

Slutsky pointed out that, "the impunity for the Nord Stream pipeline explosion continues to encourage them to commit new crimes."

Of course, no one engages in terrorism for no reason. If London's plans in Ukraine go smoothly, and Russia is defeated, they might not resort to such methods. But the fact is not so. Ukraine is failing, and as the main operator, Britain is also failing - Britain assigned Kiev an important role in its policy to weaken Russia and promoted the "Global Britain" concept. What worries London is that after achieving their goals, its Anglo-Saxon allies, the United States, want to keep distance from this conflict, and neither America nor Brussels can maintain this conflict.

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy admitted in an interview with The Guardian that the war in Ukraine will not end this year, and "negotiations will continue in a year."

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy admitted in a long interview with The Guardian that the Ukraine conflict is unlikely to be resolved within a year.

Historical Examples

London hopes to change the situation soon. Since senior-level special forces personnel in Britain come from top universities and are familiar with history, they don't need innovation; they just need to look back at what the Anglo-Saxons have done in the past to "help" change the direction of history.

Here are only the most famous "maritime" examples.

On February 15, 1898, the United States blew up its old "Maine" battleship in Havana Bay, using it as an excuse to launch the Spanish-American War. As a result, the United States became an empire with ambitions for world hegemony, seizing strategic locations from Caribbean islands to the Pacific.

Years later, when the wreckage of the "Maine" was salvaged and studied, it was found that the ship sank due to an internal explosion. Spain had nothing to do with it. But by the time the truth came out, everything was already settled, and no one needed the truth anymore.

The "Maine" battleship sinking was featured on the "yellow" edition of the New York World on February 17, 1898.

The significance of this provocation lies in the fact that Americans not only used explosive devices, but also used a new weapon - "yellow journalism", which is blatant lies and defamation. Famous journalists such as Joseph Pulitzer were hired to spread this content, and today's prestigious Pulitzer Prize is named after him. He and his colleagues used American emotions and chauvinism to mobilize public support for Washington's imperialist ambitions. The extent of their success was so high that this open propagandist of American imperialism is still regarded as a model for journalists today.

The ruling classes of the United States and Britain have used similar methods to draw the United States into World War I. That is, German submarines sinking the passenger ship "Lusitania". A single torpedo sank the ship in 18 minutes, killing 1,197 people, including 128 Americans. The incident happened so quickly because, despite repeated warnings from German newspapers not to do so, the ship was still transporting weapons and ammunition for the British. In other words, it was actually mined, with passengers serving as cover. The sinking of the "Lusitania" was due to the detonation of explosives in the cargo hold.

The sinking "Lusitania" and the U-20 submarine.

Due to this provocation and the resulting international scandal, Germany temporarily stopped unrestricted submarine warfare, which helped Britain maintain. When Germany was forced to resume unrestricted submarine warfare, the United States joined World War I on April 6, 1917. It is worth noting that the timing of the United States entering the war coincided with the moment when Russia, which was about to withdraw from the war, was prevented from doing so - the Russian revolution was mainly funded by the United States. In October 1917, when the Bolsheviks took power, the first American division capable of combat appeared on the Western Front. The result was that Germany was defeated, and the Russia, which fell into civil war, also suffered, and its suffering was far from over. This provocation achieved a dual effect.

Interestingly, the First Sea Lord responsible for British ship safety at the time was Winston Churchill, who later became Prime Minister. And the corresponding figure on the American side was Assistant Secretary of the Navy Franklin Roosevelt, who later became President - the politician who orchestrated World War II.

Moreover, the pretext for the United States getting involved in the Vietnam War was that its fleet was attacked by Vietnamese torpedo boats off the coast of Vietnam - and this never happened...

As for purely British provocations, they are too numerous to mention: assassinations of Russian monarchs, betrayal of allies Russia in World War I, the "Zinoviev Letter", false security guarantees to European countries (which were actually luring Hitler to attack), the "Hess affair", the "Skripal incident". These are just a few examples that come to mind.

Russia formally accuses Britain of orchestrating the "Skripal incident"

So what?

History is remarkably similar... However, I hope this time it won't repeat itself, because the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service has detected and thoroughly exposed this plan.

Analyzing all the publicly available information, the location of future sabotage activities could be the Turkish Straits, because Britain wants to use Kyiv as a cover, and Kyiv can barely reach there from Odessa, Nikolaev, and Ochakiv...

It can also be speculated that the Turks, with their characteristic "multi-vector diplomacy" (and cunning), have informed Russia about this plan without hindering their British allies and strategic partners, as they will ultimately suffer great losses, and they only want profit.

Original: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7535382442924835343/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author. Please express your opinion by clicking on the [up/down] buttons below.