As the deadline for tariff suspension on July 9 approaches, the global trade landscape is facing a new round of turbulence. The Trump administration has clearly stated that if no agreement is reached with major trading partners by August 1, it will reimpose unilateral "reciprocal tariffs" as high as 70% on dozens of countries. In this complex diplomatic tug-of-war involving multilateral pressure and bilateral negotiations, the talks between the United States and India have drawn particular attention.

Although there have been positive signals in recent trade negotiations between the US and India, significant differences remain on several sensitive issues. India has clearly drawn "red lines" in key areas such as agriculture and dairy products, and has stated that "the ball is now on the American side," implying that the responsibility for the final concessions does not lie with New Delhi.

Tariff Threat Looms: August 1 Could Be a Lifeline

US Treasury Secretary Becerra openly stated that Trump will send tariff notification letters to trade partners who have not reached an agreement this week, setting August 1 as the final negotiation deadline. If these countries fail to reach a trade arrangement before this date, they will be subject to the high tariffs in place on April 2. According to Becerra and US Commerce Secretary Rutenberg, the new country-specific tariff rates will range from 10% to 70%, determined directly by the president.

Commerce Secretary Becerra

This timeline aligns closely with Trump's previously announced policy rhythm. In April, the US suspended its so-called "reciprocal tariff" collection plan, giving a 90-day negotiation window and promising to advance 90 trade agreements during this period. However, according to White House trade advisor Navarro's prediction, only three agreements have been successfully concluded so far, and most lack substantial details, falling far short of expectations.

Becerra said in an interview that the purpose of the notification letters is not to immediately initiate tariffs, but to create pressure and force countries to make quick decisions between July 9 and August 1. A White House spokesperson also stated that all trade decisions will be ultimately decided by Trump himself, and negotiations are still proceeding intensively.

India: Close to an Agreement but Firm in Stance

The India-US trade negotiations have entered a critical stage. According to multiple media reports, both sides are currently engaged in final discussions on a limited trade arrangement known as a "mini agreement," which could see average tariffs around 10%. This would lay the foundation for more comprehensive trade discussions after July 9.

However, despite the apparent proximity of an agreement, India remains firm on core issues. Especially in agriculture and dairy products, India has consistently refused the US's demand for full market access. India's "Today's Business" pointed out that these industries are not only crucial for national food security but also involve the employment and livelihood of hundreds of millions of rural people.

"India has drawn red lines, and now the ball is on the American side," said an Indian senior official. Previously, the US had hoped India would remove tariff barriers on US agricultural goods, dairy products, and electric vehicles. But the Indian government fears that once the market is opened, US products enjoying high subsidies would severely impact local small farmers and family businesses.

Indian Foreign Minister Sujan Singh held high-level dialogue in Washington last week, while Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal emphasized that India will not sacrifice its national interests under external pressure. "Our negotiations are not for meeting deadlines, but for protecting national interests," Goyal said.

Other than agriculture, steel (current tariff 50%), aluminum, and cars (25%) are also focal points of contention. The US hopes India will provide more tariff reductions on industrial products, petrochemicals, and wine, especially achieving substantial progress in labor-intensive manufacturing sectors.

Retaliation Threats and Negotiation Strategy Games

If an agreement cannot be reached before the deadline, India has indicated it will take retaliatory measures. It has reportedly informed the WTO that it is preparing to impose retaliatory tariffs on US products, including increasing import duties on US cars and chemical products. India's statement has also heightened market concerns about the potential chain reactions of a failed negotiation.

Analysts point out that part of the reason India can maintain a strong stance in this round of negotiations is due to a slight improvement in its trade deficit and the fact that the US still needs India to maintain its Indo-Pacific strategic partnership. Additionally, public opinion in India generally criticizes American unilateralism, which also forces the government to be more cautious when dealing with issues affecting rural interests.

The US, on the other hand, attempts to keep the negotiation space by "delaying and setting limits." On one hand, it releases signals of a "temporary agreement," and on the other hand, it sets August 1 as the actual effective date to buffer the negotiation pace. American media generally interpret this as: although the Trump administration wants to show a tough stance, it also has to leave room for maneuver between election pressures and global supply chain stability.

Market Anxiety Increases, Global Attention on US-India Moves

As time approaches, the progress of the US-India negotiations has become a barometer for global markets. Investors worry that if an agreement is not reached, it may trigger a domino effect, with other countries possibly following India's example and taking retaliatory measures, leading to further uncertainty in the global trade order.

At the same time, India's rapidly developing sectors such as electric vehicles, renewable energy, and digital services also have structural friction with the US. If the interest boundaries are not clarified in the short term, subsequent cooperation opportunities may be limited.

Despite this, most economists believe that the trade disputes between India and the US are more likely to manifest as a game of negotiation strategies in the short term, rather than a full-scale trade war. Given the current global strategic focus on the East and the diversification of supply chains, the US is unlikely to truly cut economic ties with such a large population country like India.

Realistic Choices Between Red Lines and Negotiations

The current India-US trade conflict is not just a number game, but also a political symbol. In this diplomatic tug-of-war before the tariff deadline, one side builds pressure with a firm "reciprocal" stance, while the other side firmly defends its "national interests." Both sides are unwilling to back down easily, but they know the cost is enormous.

Ultimately, this negotiation will fall between political calculations and realistic compromises. Whether it's "red lines" or "ultimatums," the world is waiting for the first real document after July 9.

Original: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7524191173339136562/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author and welcomes your opinion through the 【like/dislike】 buttons below.