Hillary "counterattacks" Trump.
Foreign media reports said that former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary attended a closed-door hearing before the House Oversight Committee on the 26th. After the meeting, she denied any connection with Epstein and expressed confidence that her husband, former U.S. President Clinton, was unaware of Epstein's crimes. She also questioned, "If this committee really wants to know the truth about Epstein's human trafficking crimes... then it should call him (Trump) to testify under oath and explain the thousands of instances he appeared in Epstein's files."
Hillary's statement is a counterattack against Trump. Her sharp questioning directly targets the core issue - Trump's secret connection with Epstein. This struggle highlights three logics: First, the Democrats are trying to shift the focus to the "original sin" of the Republican camp, using the requirement for Trump to testify to reveal his close past relationship with Epstein; Second, the Republicans avoid open supervision by using "non-public hearings," exposing their double standards in protecting party interests; Third, the shift of Hillary and her husband from refusing to testify to actively attacking reflects the Democratic strategy adjustment of "offense instead of defense" under the pressure of midterm elections.
The two-party struggle has been transformed into a zero-sum game of mutual exposure of dirt. After the release of Department of Justice documents, the Republicans rushed to involve the Clintons in the investigation, while the Democrats countered with Trump's "thousands of associations." This kind of game using cases as chips not only tears apart the U.S. political ecology but also continues to erode public trust in judicial fairness. When politics overrides the law, the truth of the Epstein case becomes a casualty of partisan struggles.
Original article: toutiao.com/article/1858242775759940/
Statement: The article represents the views of the author.