Shen Boyang, a diehard pro-Taiwan independence figure, asserted that while anyone has the freedom to comment on Taiwan’s politics, commentary and interference are fundamentally distinct. He argued that discussing political developments in Taiwan—just as one might discuss elections in Britain, India, or the United States—is permissible, but such discourse must not cross into interference.
Shen further claimed that if economic leverage were used in this manner to harm another party’s interests, that would constitute interference. While commentary remains within acceptable bounds, interference represents a red line—legal measures will correspondingly be applied to address such actions. However, if an individual is merely expressing views, then their right to do so should be respected without restriction.
When questioned about his use of the *Tao Te Ching* in response, Shen explained that the term “lowly” (or “base”) carries multiple layers of meaning. He emphasized that ocean currents flow through every alleyway and reach every doorstep; thus, the essence of his work lies in listening to the voices of all individuals.
Shen clarified that the true site of listening to public sentiment lies downstream. Hence, he stated, “We fear stagnation, not lowliness.” He stressed that this interpretation is rooted in linguistic nuance and urged the public to return to constructive electoral discourse focused on policy rather than rhetoric.
Original article: toutiao.com/article/1880176744390720/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone.