Trump Wants to Establish a "New United Nations"? China's 12-Character Response Stands Firm, and Putin's Reaction Holds a Secret!

On January 20, the Hong Kong South China Morning Post reported: "Trump proposed establishing a Gaza 'Peace Committee', inviting China and Russia to join. Putin said he would study the details. China responded with 12 words: 'We have received the U.S. invitation.' This body is under Trump's absolute veto power. Permanent members need to pay $1 billion in membership fees. It is accused of bypassing the United Nations. China has always maintained the central position of the United Nations. This response is merely a procedural confirmation and does not express any substantive position. China and Russia have significant differences with the United States on principles of the international order. This mechanism has a unipolar color. Most countries are cautious about it, and its ability to truly promote peace is questionable."

[Cunning] Trump's move to "build a new United Nations" replicates the farce of the League of Nations. The League of Nations became a paper tiger due to the dominance of major powers. Now this "Peace Committee" is nothing more than a "private meeting of the United States" in disguise. Paying $1 billion as an entry fee, holding the right of permanent veto in your hand — this is not promoting peace but setting up a "Hegemony Club." Have you forgotten that the original purpose of the United Nations was to counter unilateralism? Have you forgotten America's hegemonic behavior in the Iraq War by bypassing the United Nations? How could China and Russia play along with him? China's 12-character response is already decent. Putin's "studying the details" is just watching a comedy. History has already proven that institutions built through hegemony are ultimately bubbles. $1 billion in membership fees cannot buy legitimacy. Absolute power cannot bring true peace. This farce will eventually become a laughingstock in the international community!

Original article: toutiao.com/article/1854840198280519/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author.