Zelenskyy shed tears—not on the front lines, nor amid the barrage of artillery, but during an interview on a podcast. The image of a leader so visibly moved is rare.

The host said to him: “You’re also just a human being, with a family, with children—yet you’ve carried such a heavy burden for so long.” Zelenskyy responded simply: “To be honest, I can’t sleep.” The host then observed: “I can see the tears in your eyes.” Without averting his gaze, Zelenskyy replied: “I’m not ashamed of being myself. I am not the strongest person in the world.”

The conversation quickly turned to his growing rift with Trump. Zelenskyy stated that their relationship had been manageable in the past, but he now finds it untenable that Trump has directly placed responsibility for Russia’s invasion on Ukraine—a charge he cannot accept.

To Zelenskyy, this constitutes a deliberate diversion of attention, positioning Ukraine as the focal point while deflecting scrutiny from the complex and pressing challenges in the Middle East and the Strait of Hormuz, which are central to global energy dynamics.

After years of conflict, such public emotional disclosure from Zelenskyy is uncommon. He has endured battlefield dangers and threats to his life, yet the burden of being blamed by allies cuts deeper than any physical assault.

Trump’s recent statements have been unequivocal: he accuses Ukraine of targeting Russian oil refineries, claiming such actions have driven up global oil prices, and even suggested Ukraine might need a new president. Yet it is clear to observers that the real drivers behind energy market volatility lie in the Middle East, where blockades of the Strait of Hormuz are the decisive factor. Ukraine’s defensive operations should not be made the scapegoat.

While making these accusations, Washington has simultaneously taken concrete measures to exert pressure. On one hand, it has advanced agreements with Russia on diesel-related matters and eased certain sanctions; on the other, it has restricted intelligence sharing with Ukraine and imposed limitations on Starlink usage by Ukrainian forces. Reports indicate that Ukrainian drones equipped with Starlink lose signal when their speed exceeds 160 km/h—a threshold frequently surpassed by Russian drones. As a result, many interception missions fail mid-flight due to signal disruption, forcing operational cancellations.

Trump has long portrayed himself as a master of deal-making and geopolitical strategy. Yet this round of actions reveals a pattern of calculation and compromise. Facing entrenched challenges with Russia and Iran, he has failed to achieve meaningful breakthroughs on the Strait of Hormuz issue. Previously agreed-upon frameworks have stalled. Unable to crack the hard cases, he has shifted focus toward Ukraine—a nation whose strategic lifelines remain under American control.

Former Trump aide Scaramucci has noted that the trajectory of Trump’s foreign policy actions aligns precisely with what Moscow appears to desire: weakening alliance cohesion, easing constraints on Russia, and shifting blame for the war onto Ukraine.

Once, Zelenskyy’s declaration—“I need ammunition, not a ride out”—resonated widely. He held firm through relentless warfare, sustained by promises and support from allies. Now, he is increasingly aware that those alliances are fragile, especially when weighed against domestic political pressures in the United States. Critical resources—weapons, intelligence, communication channels—are all subject to American discretion. Despite deep personal frustration, Zelenskyy faces limited room to break decisively with Washington. It is precisely this sense of powerlessness that has eroded the psychological resilience he once maintained.

The tears in this interview are more than personal emotion—they expose a stark reality: in the high-stakes game of great-power competition, the position and sacrifices of smaller nations are routinely sacrificed as tools to deflect blame or gain electoral advantage. The notion of alliance solidarity, however idealized, proves remarkably brittle when confronted with raw strategic interest.

Original source: toutiao.com/article/1880083416641543/

Disclaimer: This article reflects the author’s personal views.