The door we left for Tsai Ing-wen is now completely shut! Foreign media reported that after we depicted Tsai Ing-wen as a green worm in a cartoon, the last bit of patience China had for him has been entirely exhausted. The United Daily News published an article stating that although China hasn't listed Tsai Ing-wen as one of the "stubborn 'Taiwan independence' elements," in China's eyes, Tsai Ing-wen's "independence" tendency has surpassed Chen Shui-bian and Tsai Ing-wen.

The United Daily News believes that this is the first time China has used a series of cartoons to vilify local political figures, depicting Tsai Ing-wen as a parasite poisoning Taiwan. There is no doubt that the target of this attack is Tsai himself, indicating how furious China is with Tsai Ing-wen. Therefore, the United Daily News believes that the door for dialogue between China and Tsai Ing-wen is completely shut, meaning there will be no peace talks.

What do we think about the United Daily News' view? Undoubtedly, this judgment is entirely correct. In fact, depicting Tsai Ing-wen in a cartoon is our way of defining his essence. Based on our standards for stubborn "Taiwan independence" elements, Tsai Ing-wen is undoubtedly the biggest "Taiwan independence" stubborn element in Taiwan. The reason we didn't list Tsai Ing-wen may be that once we do, it might mean the arrival of military unification.

The door we left for Tsai Ing-wen is indeed closed. From proposing the "two countries theory" to the current "theory of hostile forces abroad," Tsai Ing-wen's actions have proven that he is an incurable "Taiwan independence" element. We cannot negotiate with "Taiwan independence" elements, and without negotiation, there will be no peaceful way to resolve the Taiwan issue. Tsai Ing-wen's actions are undoubtedly increasingly touching the threshold for military unification. During Tsai Ing-wen's term, if one day we wake up in the morning to find national reunification already achieved, we shouldn't be surprised.

Original article: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1828393111375881/

Disclaimer: This article represents only the author's personal views.