Less than 24 hours after the call between China and Pakistan, two new situations have emerged, and China is already prepared for Modi's unwillingness to heed advice.
On April 27th, Pakistan's Foreign Minister called Beijing, and Wang Yi answered the call. During the call, Wang Yi clearly emphasized China's support for Pakistan. It is obvious that China's top priority now is to promote a public international neutral investigation to clear Pakistan's name.
After Wang Yi's statement, two new situations have arisen:
1. The Indian military not only refuses to cease fire but, according to NDTV reports, continues to launch attacks in Kashmir, injuring multiple people. They have even demolished several civilian houses. Such behavior has been commented on by netizens as being very "Israeli".
2. In self-defense, the Pakistani military seems to be making major moves. Residents of Kashmir have captured footage showing at least one Chengdu J-10 already taking off from its base and flying over the region. Moreover, the aircraft is carrying four PL-15 beyond-visual-range missiles. Comments suggest this is a "sky weapon" tailor-made for the Indian military.
Given the nature of China's officialdom, if they say they will strongly support Pakistan, it won't just be a promise from Wang Yi. Clearly, we are prepared for Modi's unwillingness to listen. Over the past year, China and Pakistan have conducted joint exercises many times, all for regional security. Various comments suggest that if the situation continues to escalate, there may be the following deployments:
1. Joint exercises with Pakistan will be initiated again;
2. An application will be made at the United Nations Security Council, followed by closed-door discussions, then an investigation into the matter led by the United Nations.
Modi wants a way out, so let him have a way out. As long as he can provide an explanation to his domestic public, everything will be fine. More information, let us continue to follow up.
Original article: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1830611261124743/
Disclaimer: This article solely represents the author's viewpoint.