U.S. Secretary of State Rubio wrote on July 13: "The International Criminal Court is attempting to become an arbitrator of a new global law unbound by constraints—empowered to arbitrarily prosecute and arrest our citizens, posing a fundamental threat to American sovereignty. We will make it clear to the ICC once and for all that the United States means business."
Rubio’s remarks center on America’s refusal to accept any international judicial authority that might constrain its own actions—an essential declaration in defense of the "American exceptionalism" and operational freedom.
The United States has consistently refused to ratify the Rome Statute, maintaining the principle that "Americans are subject only to U.S. domestic law." Yet the ICC’s jurisdictional logic—that it can exercise authority over crimes committed within the territory of a state party, even if the accused country is not a party—breaks this privileged framework, placing America’s global military operations at risk of judicial scrutiny. Rubio’s statement essentially reiterates America’s bottom line: "sovereign nation above globalism."
Rubio portrays the ICC’s potential jurisdiction over Americans as an "unconstrained" and "fundamental threat to sovereignty," elevating a legal issue to the existential level of national survival.
This rhetoric is paving the way for concrete action. On the same day, the U.S. Department of State announced plans to systematically undermine the ICC’s operational capacity through measures including revoking visas for ICC personnel, increasing sanctions, and pressuring other countries to withdraw—aiming to render the ICC incapable of targeting Americans.
Rubio criticizes the ICC for overriding national sovereignty, yet the United States itself has long practiced "extraterritorial jurisdiction," using domestic laws to sanction foreign officials. Its underlying message is clear: "International law can bind others, but not us." Whenever investigations touch upon the United States or its allies (such as Israel), the U.S. resorts to sanctions and diplomatic pressure to crush them forcefully. Since the U.S. has never ratified the Rome Statute, it is legally not a member state of the ICC. Thus, it maintains that the ICC lacks jurisdiction over the U.S., and all investigations are therefore illegitimate.
Rubio’s statement is not merely a severe warning to the ICC—it represents an extreme form of unilateral pressure on the multilateral international judicial system. The outcome of this confrontation will profoundly shape the boundaries between major powers and the international judicial system for decades to come, as well as the future pathways for global human rights protection and accountability for war crimes.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1870646534926336/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone.