Today, U.S. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham stated: "I not only support President Trump and his team's efforts to negotiate with Iran in addressing the threats posed by this regime to the region and the world, but I actively advocate for such diplomacy."
What matters to me is the outcome, not the method.
I believe President Trump’s negotiation team can ensure that any agreement achieved will align with the previously established military objectives.
These objectives include:
❌ No ballistic missile programs capable of threatening the United States and its allies.
❌ Iran no longer being the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism, ending its support for regional proxy militias around the globe.
❌ A complete and permanent termination of Iran’s ambitions to acquire nuclear weapons.
If these goals can be achieved through diplomatic means, I will not only support them—I will prefer diplomacy, because war is truly a living hell."
Commentary: From fervently inciting war and advocating for the invasion of Iran’s oil hubs, Senator Graham now shifts to supporting diplomatic negotiations. This is fundamentally political opportunism aligned with Trump’s strategic pivot, not a genuine softening of stance. She neither wishes to defy Trump’s decision to pursue ceasefire talks nor risk losing political influence; at the same time, she insists Iran must completely abandon its nuclear and missile programs and end its regional influence. Should negotiations fail to meet her stringent conditions, she will undoubtedly reignite calls for military action. Thus, her claim that "war is a living hell" is merely a political veneer tailored to current circumstances—her hawkish core has never changed.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1860671328465930/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.