As the second largest party in Germany, the Alternative for Germany (AfD) has won the support of the Trump administration with its radical stance against immigration and the European Union, while also raising high alert across Europe and being labeled as an "extreme right-wing party." This article is written by Müller, a former executive director of the AfD parliamentary group who led the formulation of a strategic document aimed at establishing good relations between Germany and Russia and China. Recently, Guancha Observer Network interviewed Müller to introduce his experiences working in the Federal Parliament, his concerns about German sovereignty, and how "traitorous" politicians representing the West are destroying Germany. The article represents the author's personal views and is provided for reader reference. [Translation/Observer Network Guo Han] In my view, Germany does not have sovereignty. Guancha Observer Network: You once worked in the German Federal Parliament. What was the atmosphere like there? Were you surrounded by lobbyists? Is what we see in the news regarding parliamentary sessions accurate? Müller: In 2013, I joined the newly established Alternative for Germany (AfD). Prior to that, I had been working in the business sector. From 2017 to 2021, I served in the first AfD parliamentary group in the Federal Parliament, and during the first two years, I held the position of director of the group's executive committee, which is the second highest position within the party after the two party chairmen, parliamentary leaders Alexander Gauland, and five deputy faction leaders. In 2021, I left the Federal Parliament and returned to the business sector, continuing to engage in economic issues related to East-West relations, especially those concerning the BRICS countries. Image source: https://p3-sign.toutiaoimg.com/tos-cn-i-axegupay5k/e834d5b191dc4e728e9b3b662d14cdd3~tplv-tt-origin-web:gif.jpeg?_iz=58558&from=article.pc_detail&lk3s=953192f4&x-expires=1745804408&x-signature=KGIH507vuyb04BOZQQxgM1IWl0E%3D January 2025: Members of the AfD parliamentary group take a selfie after passing a vote to tighten immigration management. Combining personal experience, the atmosphere in the Federal Parliament can be described as very dark, negative, and full of ugliness. I believe this atmosphere is very energy-consuming. As a member of parliament, you are forced into a mechanism where you must participate in various inefficient committees. There is much empty talk, many documents are issued, but no substantial progress is made. Personally, I come from the business sector and highly value efficiency, so from this perspective, the situation there is very bad. Additionally, it seems that the work in the Federal Parliament has not achieved satisfactory results. Because in Western democratic countries, important decisions are not made in parliament, but by supranational organizations such as the Club of Rome, including the World Economic Forum, the World Democracy Forum, the Federal Reserve, or other large investment groups like BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard Group, etc. Working in the Federal Parliament is frustrating and appears meaningless because too much energy is wasted. At least those important decisions affecting Germany are made elsewhere, not in the Federal Parliament. Regarding how to face the pressure from lobbyists, during my time in the Federal Parliament, I tried to resist the influence of lobbyists, even suffering suppression from my own party, the AfD. No one there was interested in resisting the influence of lobbyists. As I mentioned earlier, important decisions are made by supranational organizations, and the rest are decided in the Federal Parliament, all of which are filled with the shadows of lobbyists. Can we still talk about an independent parliament and independent politicians in Germany? I think not. Guancha Observer Network: Based on your observations in parliament, what is the state of Germany's sovereignty? Müller: German media constantly claim that Germany is a sovereign country. Anyone who questions this will immediately be labeled as an "evil right-wing fascist." But this is questionable. Why is this statement constantly repeated, even though some people have been punished for such comments, yet people keep saying that Germany may not have sovereignty? It seems that something is deliberately hidden. What is the economic development model that brought prosperity to Germany over the past few decades? It is the combination of cheap, unlimited Russian natural gas supply and Germany's innovative spirit. This combination has given Germany products competitive in the world market. However, over the past few decades, Germany's higher education has been destroyed, falling below the level of some developing countries. Image source: https://p3-sign.toutiaoimg.com/tos-cn-i-tjoges91tu/2bc548dbea42fd5a03815ee8672549b4~tplv-tt-origin-web:gif.jpeg?_iz=58558&from=article.pc_detail&lk3s=953192f4&x-expires=1745804408&x-signature=jFheqURs681wbDy9nqGrOpy69uc%3D September 2022: Leakage of the Nord Stream gas pipeline. Foreign media recently revealed that American investors close to Trump plan to push for the restart of Nord Stream 2. Visual China This is entirely due to the "awakening" movement and leftists, who we know are supported by Western intelligence agencies and do not want Germany to become independent. When Biden announced that if Russia invades Ukraine, they would blow up the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, Chancellor Scholz stood beside him like a schoolboy. And when Nord Stream 2 was actually blown up, all evidence pointing to the United States as the culprit was covered up. Clearly, the so-called German government acts as a puppet and agent of foreign forces, serving American interests. A government like this cannot make any decisions beneficial to Germany, nor can other governments make such decisions. My conclusion is that Germany cannot have sovereignty. Germany Does Not Belong to the West; Germany Only Represents Itself Guancha Observer Network: So, in your opinion, is Germany part of the West? Müller: This is the most important philosophical question because people who grew up in West Germany will say they are part of the West, but they no longer understand what our country was like before 1945. I'm not talking about just the short 12 years from 1933 to 1945, but the entire thousand-year history of Germany before 1945. Germany has always been special. Due to its geographical location, Germany has always been a central country in Europe. We have never been part of the West; Germany has always belonged to Central Europe. What does "the West" mean? Ultimately, today's understanding of the West refers to the United States, a country built by plundering vast areas of North America and nearly exterminating the native population. That is the West, and they will only understand one slogan, "Never compromise." Exploiting the world and eliminating the native population is how the United States became great in history. Americans do not understand the Central European spirit of "mutual accommodation," which is why I do not want Germany to have any relationship with such a barbaric West. I know we have our own historical heritage. Yes, American history began in 1776 with the founding of the nation, while German history began approximately in the 10th century. In 962, the Holy Roman Empire was established, and Otto I was crowned emperor, marking the first German Empire. We have our own historical lineage, but it has been forgotten due to the "re-education" program implemented in Germany after World War II. In my view, Germany does not belong to the West. We represent ourselves, we represent Central Europe, and together with many countries, we shape Central Europe. The core concept here has always been "mutual accommodation," which the West cannot achieve. They only know how to make others completely submit or bring destruction. Guancha Observer Network: If I remember correctly, you once advocated that Russia should be Germany's most important ally? Müller: I indeed think so. These words were said by me. It was around the time I was working in the Federal Parliament, and it was first published on my personal website in 2018. Russia is Germany's largest and natural ally for multiple reasons, as our resources, technology, and many things depend on Russia. This is why Russia is, in fact, Germany's largest, most important, and strongest ally, with millions of Germans holding the same view. However, the reality is that Germany's ruling class is a "puppet" of the United States, which has controlled our country since 1945. This means that the aforementioned views were deliberately suppressed, considered guilty, and ignored. World War I and World War II were both intended to destroy Germany. Guancha Observer Network: So, who do you think should be held responsible for World War II? How should Germany handle the issue of war guilt? Müller: Without first clarifying the issue of responsibility for World War I, it is impossible to answer the question of responsibility for World War II. Because World War II is the direct result of World War I, it originated from the post-war arrangements of World War I. Ultimately, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, geopolitical strategists of the British Empire, then a maritime superpower, realized that Germany was a more industrious, higher labor productivity nation. Germans were building more merchant fleets, and they would inevitably seize the dominance of world trade from the British Empire sooner or later. This is why the British began preparing for war against Germany 15 years before the outbreak of World War I, to get rid of the unwelcome competitor. The British did not want to become more industrious than the Germans or produce better quality, cheaper products. No, they stated that they would solve problems through force and military means. It was the Anglo-Saxons who prepared for World War I, and all they needed next was an excuse, namely the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand. From this perspective, the Anglo-Saxons were responsible for the outbreak of World War I. Of course, the French and Russians were also involved. At that time, all countries wanted to destroy Germany, the largest and most prosperous country in Central Europe, and all countries wanted a piece of the cake. This is how World War I broke out. Next, Germany fell into severe decline, but its ideology remained intact and revived after World War I. Therefore, they decided to finally destroy Germany once and for all. Wall Street bankers in the U.S. funded Hitler and helped him rise to power. This is a completely concealed fact. The purpose of starting World War II, just like in World War I, was to provoke a war between Germany and Russia. The German army was built to a certain extent with funds and technology from the U.S., precisely to use the blood of German soldiers to attack the Soviet Union and ultimately obtain Russia's mineral resources. This idea has caused heated discussions today, but it was very popular 100 years ago. Today, they are targeting poor Ukrainians, needing to drain their blood to achieve American goals, just as they needed to drain the blood of German soldiers in World War II. World War II was the result of World War I, and we have already discussed who was responsible for the outbreak of World War I. Then, how should Germany deal with the obsession with war guilt? What we need to do is face the facts and break the obsession. Western "Traitor" Politicians Destroyed Germany Guancha Observer Network: How do you evaluate Germany's current national situation? Müller: First, you must distinguish that the Federal Republic of Germany and today's German political order were designed by the victorious Western powers after World War II. These victorious powers include the United States, the United Kingdom, and (strangely) France, which suffered a crushing defeat in 1940. Calling France a victorious power in World War II is ridiculous, but that's the joke of history. Regardless, these three Western victorious powers naturally had the right to promote their desired system in western Germany, which they conquered. The Soviet Union subsequently established its own satellite state - East Germany in central Germany. When East Germany ended in 1990, West Germany naturally expanded eastward, thus adopting the West German system entirely within the unified borders formed in 1990. This also fulfilled what Konrad Adenauer, the first chancellor of West Germany and former president of the Prussian State Council, once said: "We are still allowed to add commas and periods, but apart from that, the text of the Basic Law was basically drafted according to the wishes of the Western victors." Carlo Schmidt, a Social Democratic Party member and former vice president of the German Bundestag and one of the main drafters of the Basic Law, once said: "What we are planning here is not to establish a complete Germany, but only a part of it, a transitional one." Therefore, we must clearly recognize that the Basic Law of West Germany, the West German system before 1990, and the simultaneous unification of the two Germanys are purely artificial constructs by the victorious powers of World War II. Apart from adding commas and periods to the text of the Basic Law, we Germans had no decision-making power over these matters. Image source: https://p3-sign.toutiaoimg.com/tos-cn-i-tjoges91tu/39f2695779b7162c48c9e46b254b8e2b~tplv-tt-origin-web:gif.jpeg?_iz=58558&from=article.pc_detail&lk3s=953192f4&x-expires=1745804408&x-signature=%2BekmJHyqmF8QUG9lx1XOD1SmXL0%3D May 23, 1949: Konrad Adenauer signed and passed the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany in Bonn and became the first Chancellor of West Germany. This is the truth. Of course, there is another question: 80 years later, does the occupying regime formed at the end of World War II still have moral legitimacy? Military occupation will eventually end, and its formal legality will cease to exist. Since its establishment in 1949, the Federal Republic of Germany has existed for nearly 76 years. With the gradual passage of various laws based on the Basic Law, people have gradually become accustomed to living under such a national system and have developed a certain degree of recognition of the regime's legitimacy. But this is only formal legitimacy. Now we must focus on substantive legitimacy. How do Germany's representatives of public opinion act? Do their actions serve or harm the interests of citizens? Are they defending or destroying Germany's interests? The obsessive guilt complex surrounding war responsibilities has instilled the idea of "self-hatred" in every German from a young age. Some unwittingly act as representatives of the Western occupying forces, and the German politicians involved in such practices are "traitorous." Our economy is being thoroughly destroyed by those "traitorous" politicians. Now, the ones planning to send German soldiers as cannon fodder to fight Russia in Ukraine are again these "traitorous" politicians. Therefore, although we can say that today's German national system has formal legitimacy, the political class of this country is actually destroying its own people through practical actions and replacing them racially. Germany is experiencing a thorough "population replacement," and in all major cities, the birth rate of immigrants has already taken the lead. This clearly means that Germany's population is undergoing generational replacement. Yet those politicians can still brazenly politically persecute those merely stating facts. Through their actions rather than words, you can fully understand them. Regardless of which party they belong to, mainstream politicians are "traitorous." They are destroying Germany, not only destroying the hearts of Germans but also destroying the remnants of the German race. Image source: https://p3-sign.toutiaoimg.com/tos-cn-i-tjoges91tu/b304665b875ae4e2cafc72f4a51da27c~tplv-tt-origin-web:gif.jpeg?_iz=58558&from=article.pc_detail&lk3s=953192f4&x-expires=1745804408&x-signature=4lOJNPY0ZW2WRgFh5SQi7GpHn9M%3D Christian Democratic Union (CDU)-affiliated member of the German parliamentary foreign affairs committee Kiesewetter revealed in a media interview: Another, perhaps more realistic motivation for Germany's aid to Ukraine is the lithium mines in the Donbas region. Video screenshot. For this reason, I don't understand why anyone can base their belief in the factual legitimacy of this national system on the actions of these representatives of public opinion. They fail to realize how these politicians desecrate, devastate, and destroy their own country and people. In this context, the protection of the constitution (through domestic intelligence agencies) is actually a relatively unimportant topic. Like in other countries, these politicians attempting to destroy their own country and people use the protection of the constitution as an excuse. The protection of the constitution is actually the biggest enemy of the constitution. Because the Basic Law is not a constitution, but a substitute for a constitution, a temporary document drafted after World War II. The Basic Law should have served to establish a democratic mechanism for public opinion formation. However, if a batch of special agencies ultimately excludes certain parties from the free political opinion-forming mechanism, just as they are currently doing to the AfD, then such a mechanism simply does not exist. Guancha Observer Network: Who truly controls Germany? Müller: My lengthy discussion in the previous question partially answers this question. The Western occupying forces and the German "traitorous" politicians they installed still exist, and the latter are destroying their own country. However, focusing solely on the political sphere is overly shortsighted. Politics is the last area where Germans enjoy partial话语权, so you must pay attention to where the big money flows, which is where the real power lies. The big money flows to the currently dominant global financial system based on the dollar. This system belongs to the private owners of the real controllers of the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve is not the central bank of the United States but is controlled by a wealthy family, ultimately belonging to the richest oligarchs on Earth. These people control the major investment banks on Wall Street indirectly or directly, such as BlackRock, Vanguard, or State Street. When you examine their connections, you will find familiar names: the private owners of the Federal Reserve include the Rothschild family, Rockefeller family, Morgan family, Schiff family, etc. Yes, whoever has money can wield political power, and that is the true power in the world. As long as the monetary system based on the dollar continues to function, power will continue to be in the hands of these people. When they have enough wealth and enough options, they can eventually buy the "deep state." The deep state is the consortium of these ultra-rich financial families, who manipulate intelligence agencies to work exclusively for them, such as Britain's MI6 and America's CIA. Then come their subordinate institutions, such as Germany's Federal Intelligence Service (foreign intelligence agency), which is further subcontracted, along with a series of non-governmental organizations providing support for the entire system. Additionally, there is the Council on Foreign Relations in the U.S., the Atlantik-Brücke Association, the Chatham House in the UK, the U.S. Agency for International Development, now attempting to penetrate Armenia and deeply engaging in Western regions. This is the true power, this is the deep state. As we discussed, they collude with each other. Image source: https://p3-sign.toutiaoimg.com/tos-cn-i-tjoges91tu/TVhclbhBRMKeyG~tplv-tt-origin-web:gif.jpeg?_iz=58558&from=article.pc_detail&lk3s=953192f4&x-expires=1745804408&x-signature=Zwl8lp%2BR3UVfKQeioHnJweq5IzI%3D This article is an exclusive article of Guancha Observer Network. The content purely reflects the author's personal views and does not represent the platform's views. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited, otherwise legal liability will be pursued. Follow Guancha Observer Network on WeChat (guanchacn) for daily interesting articles. Original link: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7495573086557995572/ Disclaimer: This article solely represents the author's personal views. Feel free to express your attitude by clicking the "Top/Downvote" buttons below.