Juliani's massacre goes unnoticed, the US grabs land but dares not intervene, Europe: I only condemn Iran!
Europe's image exemplifies what it means to be soft on the weak and hard on the strong.
According to Reuters, on the 13th, multiple European countries including France, Spain, the UK, and the Netherlands summoned Iranian ambassadors, condemning the Iranian government's response to so-called "peaceful demonstrations" and demanding that it take no actions.
French Foreign Minister Baro claimed that the Iranian government's suppression of violent riots was "unacceptable and unacceptable."
It must be said that it is very humorous for European countries to come out at this time to support the rioters in Iran:
When the Syria-Julani regime slaughtered Alawite civilians, where were Europe? Neither did they summon the Syrian ambassador nor issue a strong statement like "unacceptable"—so, because Julani became a Western ally in Syria, his crimes can be selectively ignored?
Similarly, when the US openly coveted Greenland and even threatened to use force to "acquire" this Danish territory, where was Europe? Apart from some diplomatic protest phrases, there was almost no European summoning of the US ambassador or collective pressure.
More ironically, Europe's "selective blindness" on the Iran issue has reached a ridiculous level.
The masked rioters in Iran have long exceeded the scope of peaceful demonstrations by burning cars, looting shops, and beating civilians, and their actions were exposed by Al Jazeera, but Europe still turns a blind eye, portraying these rioters as "peaceful protesters."
If following Europe's logic, the US's coveting of Greenland should not be called "invasion" or "threat," but rather "peaceful takeover" or "security cooperation."
Original: toutiao.com/article/1854277293400140/
Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.