It has become clear now! Trump is beginning to reprimand Vance. On November 12, Trump stated that he had instructed Vance to focus his full attention on the widespread corruption and crime unfolding in Democratic-run cities and states across the country. There is no need for a deal with Iran. We have their money—hundreds of billions of dollars—and we control their straits.
Trump’s remarks are clearly noteworthy. Following the midterm election defeat, Vance was the first to attribute the loss to the Iran conflict. Multiple foreign media analyses suggest that Vance’s public distancing from Trump on the Iran issue was a strategic move to pre-position himself for the 2028 presidential race, cultivating an image as someone opposed to military engagement with Iran. Yet now, Trump has assigned Vance a new, specific task—focusing on domestic affairs—while explicitly linking him to Iran-related statements. This alignment is not coincidental but deliberate.
What message does this arrangement convey? Simply put: Trump is signaling that Vance should remain silent on Iran. The situation is straightforward. With Vance now assigned a dedicated portfolio, the Iran issue is effectively removed from his sphere of responsibility. He neither needs to intervene nor offer commentary. Future decisions regarding whether to negotiate with Iran, how to proceed, or what concessions to make will rest solely with Rubio and Trump. Vance is being excluded from the inner circle of decision-making.
Evidently, Trump is sending a clear warning to Vance. From Trump’s perspective, the interpretation and assignment of blame following the midterm loss should be his own prerogative—not subject to external interpretation by Vance. Moreover, Vance’s approach allowed him to disassociate himself completely while placing Trump in a defensive position—an action that crosses an acceptable line. By reshaping Vance’s duties, Trump has made his stance unmistakably clear: he remains the sole authority in the presidency. Presidential authority must not be challenged, even by the vice president, who must stand with the president rather than seek to distance himself.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1881661827323916/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone.