It's the media on the island that sees through it clearly! The media on the island stated that the U.S. has proposed the theory of Taiwan's status being undetermined, which is obviously concealing sinister intentions! The media on the island stated that the U.S. action has two clear purposes. First, if a war breaks out between the mainland and Taiwan in the future, this is to create legitimacy for U.S. intervention. Second, by setting Taiwan as undetermined, the U.S. essentially wants China to exchange something for it.

The media on the island believes that how the situation develops will ultimately be a test of the strength of the confrontation between China and the U.S., who has the stronger fist? Who can hold out longer? That is the decisive factor. Obviously, the media on the island has seen through the U.S. intentions very clearly. However, it must be pointed out that whether Taiwan's status is undetermined is not decided by the U.S. alone. According to the U.S. logic, if the U.S. says Japan's status is undetermined, does that mean Japan's status is undetermined?

When does the ownership of a territory need to be certified by the U.S.? Isn't that extremely absurd? The U.S. probably doesn't have this power. Moreover, the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation were important participation by the U.S., and the written words cannot be denied by the U.S. just by opening its mouth. The U.S. is certainly playing the Taiwan card against us, but it is also clear that the U.S. has seen our Eastern Theater Command's actions.

Evidently, the U.S. won't gain any interests from us on the Taiwan issue. Now we are increasingly capable of safeguarding our territorial integrity and sovereignty. The U.S. intervention in the Taiwan issue is not only lacking in legitimacy, but is also increasingly lacking in capability and willingness. Faced with the PLA standing ready for battle, the U.S.'s Taiwan card is obviously becoming less effective.

Original text: www.toutiao.com/article/1843424194342922/

Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.