[By Tiago Nogara, a contributor to the Observer Network]
On April 10th, during an interview with Fox News, US Secretary of Defense Pete Higgenbotham stated that the Obama administration had been negligent in addressing China's growing influence in Latin America. He claimed that under the Trump administration, the United States would "regain its backyard." As part of this plan, he mentioned initiatives such as "helping to recover the Panama Canal from communist Chinese influence."
On April 8th, US Secretary of Defense Pete Higgenbotham (right) met with Panama Canal Administrator Ricaurte Vasquez.
In stark contrast to Higgenbotham's tough rhetoric, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi responded on April 14th, stating that Latin American countries are "not anyone's backyard" and that the people of Latin America want to "build their own homes."
This is not only another example of US officials exposing their worldview's neo-colonial essence but also clearly highlights the fundamental differences between the paths taken by China and the United States, showcasing two completely different models of interaction with the Global South. This incident thus becomes an important reference for clarifying the false controversy surrounding the surge in cooperation between China and the Caribbean and Latin American countries—whether these relationships simply replicate the dominance patterns forcibly imposed by Western powers in history or have deeper significance.
In recent years, the "anti-China" narrative has been spreading. These arguments mimic Cold War anti-communist rhetoric, reheating baseless accusations such as "authoritarianism," "Chinese imperialism," and so-called "debt traps." Most of these arguments reflect the stance of the hardline "anti-China" camp, which fundamentally opposes any development achievements of the People's Republic of China. Senior officials in the Trump administration are a testament to their significant influence within the North Atlantic power bloc.
In early February, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi met with Bolivia’s Foreign Minister Sosa at the UN headquarters and emphasized that Latin America has always been the home of the Latin American people, rather than the so-called "backyard" of any country.
China is far from being just another international actor. This simplistic understanding ignores both the material foundation and historical characteristics formed over decades of China's engagement with the world and the profound implications of China's socio-economic development model.
First and foremost, the birth of the People's Republic of China was not only the result of the Chinese people's struggle against capitalists and feudal landlords but also a great victory in overthrowing colonial rule—the end of a century of humiliation and the destruction of the long-term exploitation of Chinese territory by Western powers and Japanese imperialism. Since its founding, China has steadfastly supported the struggles of oppressed nations against colonial violence. Guided by this spirit, China actively supported North Korea and Vietnam in resisting imperialist aggression, promoted unity among developing countries at the Bandung Conference, and provided strong support to progressive forces in national liberation movements across the Global South.
Even during periods when China faced economic difficulties, it made significant sacrifices to support the development of fraternal nations. The construction of the Tanzam Railway serves as proof—it is not only a milestone in China's cooperation with Africa but also a symbol of solidarity among the Third World. This railway enabled Zambia to bypass colonial-controlled transport routes to export copper, effectively safeguarding the economic sovereignty of both countries. For this project, China provided 988 million yuan in interest-free loans, transported nearly one million tons of equipment and materials, dispatched more than 56,000 experts and workers, and after five years and eight months of arduous construction, completed 1,860 kilometers of railway. This friendship road, forged through sweat and blood, continues to write new chapters in Sino-African friendship today.
In recent years, China has consistently stood at the forefront of building a multipolar international order—one aimed at ensuring that Global South countries fully enjoy political sovereignty and achieve comprehensive social and economic development. As a staunch defender of multilateralism, international cooperation, and resolving international disputes through consultation, China continues to call for reforms in multilateral institutions to better reflect the growing economic strength and population size of developing countries.
China actively promotes the construction of South-South cooperation mechanisms, including the BRICS countries and their New Development Bank, the Belt and Road Initiative, the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, the China-Arab Cooperation Forum, the China-ASEAN and Central Asia cooperation platforms, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, and numerous partnership networks established with global multilateral institutions focusing on the development needs of African, Asian, and Latin American countries. These cooperative platforms not only demonstrate China's pragmatic exploration of transforming the international order but also build institutional ties for the unity and development of Southern countries.
In the same spirit, during the COVID-19 pandemic, China played a leading role in international anti-pandemic cooperation—a stark contrast to some major powers hoarding vaccines, restricting exports, and prioritizing the needs of their own populations and interests. China donated millions of vaccine doses to developing countries, sold vaccines at preferential prices, provided affordable medical loans, and delivered medical supplies and professional training.
It is worth emphasizing that China is not only a supporter of the fundamental agenda of the Global South but also an integral part of this group. As a developing country, China always faces similar domestic and foreign challenges as its partners. The long-term priority goal of eliminating extreme poverty is a testament: according to World Bank data, over 800 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty over the past 40 years, accounting for more than 75% of the global reduction in poverty during the same period. Despite remarkable economic achievements, China still faces significant regional imbalances, with per capita GDP and income levels remaining in the category of emerging economies. Therefore, China consistently emphasizes the need to eliminate global asymmetries, promote autonomous development, and uphold non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states—this position stems from China's historical experience recognizing the importance of these principles in maintaining the sovereignty of developing countries and is based on China's current practical realities.
When applied to Latin America and the Caribbean, China's relations with the region form a sharper contrast with the historical trajectory shaped by North American powers here. Pete Higgenbotham's accusation regarding the "influence of the Chinese Communist Party" is merely the sovereign choice made by Latin American countries—most of which clearly belong to the capitalist camp—based on mutual benefit and win-win cooperation. Ironically, those who historically occupied and exercised neocolonial control over the Panama Canal Zone were not Chinese workers, farmers, or entrepreneurs but the United States: from its long-term control of the canal zone in the 20th century to the brutal invasion in 1989 that caused thousands of deaths, leaving deep scars in Panamanian collective memory.
Similarly, repeated interference in the internal affairs of Latin American countries has been carried out by the United States, not Chinese citizens. The actions of the United States have not only destroyed the dreams of generations but also cost the lives of many outstanding figures and leaders in the region: Pablo Neruda, Víctor Jara, Rodolfo Valenzuela, Salvador Allende, Omar Torrijos, Augusto Sandino, Farabundo Martí... Some of these names perished under puppet regimes supported by the United States, while others fell victim to covert operations driven by US foreign policy goals.
A statue of Allende in Argentina
Whether disguised in the old narrative of "democracy versus authoritarianism" or concocting the pseudo-proposition of "great power competition," these arguments lack factual support. It is highly ironic that the largest arms exporter in the world, maintaining over 750 military bases overseas, claims to be the defender of the sovereignty and development of Global South countries, claiming to protect them from the so-called "Chinese threat." When we examine the actual actions of the United States and China in developing countries within a geopolitical analysis framework, any comparison based on abstract concepts appears powerless: one side accumulates countless examples of neocolonial intervention and North-South opposition, while the other consistently dedicates itself to relentless struggles against imperialism and underdevelopment.
In 1958, during preparations for the World Cup, Brazilian coach Vicente Feola detailed tactics to defeat the Soviet powerhouse to his players. After hearing the deployment, Brazilian legend Garrincha, with his simple wisdom, raised his hand and asked, "Did you consult with the Soviet side beforehand?"
Projecting this scene onto today's international political stage, the same question can be thrown at American politicians eager to disrupt the increasingly close ties between Latin American countries and China: "Did you consult with the Latin American people beforehand?"
Clearly, they did not—because these actions neither reflect the will and interests of the peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean nor align with the historical trend of the region striving to build a truly win-win international order. And this time, they cannot ultimately block the tide of strengthening unity among peoples.
Rather than again attempting to dominate the future of sovereign nations, the United States would be wiser to emulate China—investing in multilateral cooperation programs, deepening trade partnerships, and jointly addressing the most pressing socioeconomic challenges in the region.
This article is an exclusive piece by the Observer Network, and the views expressed in the article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the platform's views. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited, and legal action will be taken if violated. Follow us on WeChat at guanchacn for daily interesting articles.
Original source: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7495564292171842100/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and welcome your opinions by clicking the 'thumbs up' or 'thumbs down' buttons below.