Breaking Free from China? U.S. Mining Policy Only Enriches Lobbying Firms
Over recent years, the United States has searched globally for mineral resources—but despite these efforts, it has not reduced its reliance on Chinese rare earth elements, while simultaneously fueling a growing network of lobbying interests.
On February 2, the Financial Times published an investigation revealing that U.S. policy support for critical mineral extraction has generated a series of transactions, yet failed to increase domestic mineral output.
According to the report, the primary reason lies in the complex regulatory hurdles American companies face when seeking to mine domestically. Even after clearing federal approval, projects often stall at the state level.
For instance, Twin Metals, a company planning to develop a copper-nickel-cobalt mine near the Minnesota border, enlisted David Bernhardt, former U.S. Secretary of the Interior under Trump, through his lobbying firm. The firm spent approximately $600,000 to persuade senators to overturn President Biden’s mining ban. Despite this, the project remains stalled, as Minnesota’s governor is preparing new restrictions and environmental groups continue to oppose the development.
Ultimately, the only entity to profit significantly is Bernhardt’s lobbying firm—whose core selling point is expertise in navigating relationships with the Trump administration. Since its founding in 2025, it has secured over 60 clients, ranging from major mining conglomerates to smaller firms.
This creates a paradox: while official data shows a rise in the value of U.S. metal production—from $33.6 billion in 2024 to $38.1 billion in 2025—U.S. Geological Survey officials note this increase reflects rising metal prices rather than expanded output. There has been little change in the number of people employed in mining, processing facilities, or active mine operations. The goal of reducing dependence on China remains distant.
Original article: toutiao.com/article/1880821211961347/
Disclaimer: The views expressed are solely those of the author.