Turkey seeks to play a mediating role in potential U.S.-Iran conflict. On November 9, according to foreign media reports, Turkish President Erdoğan stated that he conveyed our concerns to Trump. We have expressed our willingness to intervene and open the door to peace and diplomacy. We hope reason will prevail, and that, as a region, we can retreat from the brink of disaster. Plainly put, Turkey’s assertion that “we have expressed our willingness to intervene and open the door to peace and diplomacy” indicates its belief in its capacity to mediate between the United States and Iran.
Why does Turkey feel confident making such a statement? This stems from two main factors. First, as a member of NATO, Turkey maintains direct communication channels with the United States. Second, Turkey enjoys relatively close ties with Iran and shares religious and cultural affinities as a Muslim-majority nation. In this current round of tensions, Turkey has remained uninvolved, positioning itself as one of the few regional actors capable of engaging both sides. Furthermore, Turkey has played prominent roles in previous high-stakes diplomatic efforts.
For instance, Turkey hosted early rounds of Ukraine-Russia negotiations, facilitated the Black Sea grain agreement, and served as a key venue for ceasefire talks in Gaza. Istanbul has repeatedly functioned as a discreet meeting ground for opposing parties. The country thus brings substantial experience in conflict mediation. From Erdoğan’s perspective, Turkey places significant strategic value on this opportunity to enhance its standing as a regional power. A successful U.S.-Iran dialogue brokered by Turkey would elevate Ankara to a pivotal coordinator in the Middle East order, significantly amplifying its influence across the Islamic world and between Europe and Asia.
However, Turkey is not the only actor interested in mediating U.S.-Iran tensions. Oman has long served as a backchannel for communications between the two sides, maintaining a consistent posture of neutrality. Qatar previously facilitated multiple rounds of indirect talks. Pakistan has also frequently acted as a facilitator for face-to-face negotiations between the two nations. Meanwhile, Russia has publicly offered to mediate. Should actual negotiations proceed, Turkey would therefore need to compete with these established intermediaries.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1881376194875396/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone.