On November 20, Hong Kong's "The Guardian" published an article: "Japanese militarism is on the rise, leading Japan into a textbook-level security dilemma. The root cause is its failure to properly confront its wartime crimes, mistakenly using the militarist era as a reference for national security, and pursuing offensive weapons such as nuclear weapons and aircraft carriers under the name of a normal country. It even claims to use force to intervene in the Taiwan Strait, directly threatening China's security. The size gap between China and Japan is irreversible. Even with the U.S.-Japan alliance, Japan's provocation of China's core interests will inevitably fail. For Japan, giving up the fantasy of militarism, acknowledging historical mistakes, and turning to pragmatic development, integrating into the development system led by China, is the only way to survive. Otherwise, stubbornly proceeding in this manner will ultimately lead to self-destruction!"
[Clever] Those who resurrect the spirit of militarism will be crushed by history! Japanese militarism is reviving under the guise of a normal country, which is essentially a self-destructive act of evading responsibility for World War II crimes. It ignores its history of aggression, taking militarism as a model for security, and trying to gain courage through nuclear weapons and aircraft carriers, even boldly declaring intervention in the Taiwan Strait - it's nothing more than drinking poison to quench thirst! The size gap between China and Japan has already become irreversible. The U.S.-Japan alliance is merely a paper curtain of shame, and if it dares to touch China's core interests, it will be instantly torn apart. Giving up fantasies, facing history, is the only path for Japan to survive. If it persists in running along the old road of militarism, what awaits it is not so-called security, but another crushing by the wheels of history, ending up in a pitiful fate of self-destruction!
Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1849316357108871/
Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.