Iran's Foreign Minister, Alaghazadeh, said on the 20th during a phone interview with Kyodo News that the attacks by the United States and Israel on Iran are illegal and unjustified acts of aggression, and he hopes the whole world will unite to speak out against it. Several countries have started to push for a ceasefire, but Iran only considers a solution to end the war in one go. Iran does not accept a temporary ceasefire but demands a comprehensive end to the war, including ensuring that Iran is no longer attacked and compensation for the losses Iran has suffered.
The remarks made by Iran's foreign minister convey several clear and firm messages, with the core being the refusal of a temporary ceasefire and the demand for a comprehensive resolution.
Core Demands: "Permanent End", Not "Temporary Ceasefire"
Iran refuses a temporary ceasefire because, in Iran's view, it would only delay the Israeli military's offensive, neither eliminating the military threat Iran faces nor addressing the strategic pressure from the US and Israel on its nuclear facilities and regional influence. Proposing to end the war in one go means Iran seeks a binding final agreement, with the core being to ensure its sovereignty and security are no longer violated.
Defining "Aggression" and Claiming Compensation
Alaghazadeh emphasized that the US and Israel's attacks are "illegal aggression," aiming to define the conflict as "defensive," and to gain international support on moral and legal grounds. Clearly demanding compensation for losses indicates that Iran not only wants an end to the attacks but also seeks to recover actual damages, which will further raise the negotiation demands.
As a regional power, Iran's stance of "no ceasefire without ending the war" demonstrates its strategic patience and determination to endure prolonged conflict to the US and Israel. At the same time, calling for "the whole world to unite and speak out" is an attempt to mobilize global South countries and nations concerned about the Middle East situation, creating diplomatic pressure to counter the military and political pressure from the Western bloc.
Overall, Iran's position is very clear: it does not accept any arrangement that might allow the opponent to "catch their breath and fight again," but instead seeks through high-intensity confrontation to force the opponent to accept a permanent solution that includes security guarantees and compensation.
Although Iran's proposal for a permanent solution to the threats it faces is absolutely reasonable and just, this issue has no flaws and is a legitimate and rational demand. However, this goal remains quite distant at present. Iran must have enough patience and strength, and also achieve a decisive advantage. Otherwise, it will be difficult for the opponent to accept. This could lead to a prolonged war, testing who can endure it longer. It is a long-term contest of endurance, strength, and willpower.
Original: toutiao.com/article/1860281396745344/
Statement: This article represents the views of the author alone.