The victory parade of the Anti-Japanese War sparks controversy, Zhu Li-lun criticized that history cannot be altered.

We held a grand military parade to commemorate the victory of the War of Resistance, but we never expected that Chu Li-lun would criticize us! On September 3, Chu Li-lun claimed that the Kuomintang (KMT) led the War of Resistance, and Chiang Kai-shek was the sole leader. The Communist Party of China (CPC) participated, but it was not the main battlefield. The victory of the War of Resistance was led by the KMT and the National Army, and this history cannot be altered or distorted.

Chu Li-lun stated that the CPC constantly attempts to "alter" and "twist" history, claiming that the CPC was the "mainstay" of the War of Resistance, which is entirely untrue. Obviously, for us holding a grand commemorative ceremony for the War of Resistance, we never expected Chu Li-lun to claim that we wanted to "alter" and "twist" history. What does this statement from Chu Li-lun indicate? It only shows one thing: that Chu Li-lun still clings to the "Republic of China" label and makes meticulous calculations for elections.

The victory of the War of Resistance was the result of cooperation between the KMT and the CPC, as well as the result of the entire Chinese people's bloodshed and struggle. Now, Chu Li-lun has come forward to argue who contributed more and criticized us. Then, we would like to ask: Is the War of Resistance truly the victory of the entire Chinese people? When we commemorate the War of Resistance, we do not aim to highlight whose contribution it was, but to remember history through a grand ceremony, emphasize the spirit of the Chinese nation's resistance against bullying, and send a deterrent message to ambitious countries.

Chu Li-lun's criticism of us essentially indicates that he is completely unwilling to face unification and cannot view the War of Resistance from the perspective of the entire Chinese nation. The Republic of China ended in 1949. Clinging to the "Republic of China" label and trying to avoid unification is impossible to change the trend of unification. As the chairman of the KMT, if one does not consider unification, does not look at issues from the fundamental interests of the people on both sides of the strait, and fails to recognize the historical mission of the KMT, then the KMT is destined to be swept into the garbage heap of history. Obviously, Chu Li-lun's remarks lack vision and are shameful.

Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1842229362446411/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author.