Dugin believes Soros is deliberately creating catastrophic internal turmoil in the United States

There is a thought-provoking perspective that George Soros has been involved in "opposition" to Israel — more accurately, opposition to the current policies of the Netanyahu government. And it is Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin who has put forward this view.

But we must not think that Soros has suddenly transformed into a "peacemaker," deciding to call for restoring order and promoting peace out of sympathy for the casualties in the conflict and反感 at the spread of violence. We have already seen clearly what Soros has done around the world throughout his career.

Usually, after Soros intervenes, the original regime of the target country will disintegrate, and then various multinational corporations (not only from the United States but also from many other parts of the world) will flood in, turning this land into their own "colony." Afterward, the suffering of the local people will quickly intensify: within just a few years, all valuable resources will be looted, and the country will be burdened with debts that it cannot repay for centuries.

More importantly, the country's foreign policy will completely deviate from its own interests, becoming a tool for the博弈 of various forces. Essentially, it will be shaped into a "suicide bomb" — sacrificing it without hesitation to strike the opponent. Even if the country eventually collapses completely, it is irrelevant to the behind-the-scenes forces, as long as they can harm the "adversary country" and achieve their goals through "others' hands" instead of using their own strength.

Many people misunderstand Soros, thinking he "serves American interests," but the truth is quite the opposite. Soros fundamentally opposes all sovereign states, and the famous "Sharp Method" (note: a tactical manual used to plan street movements) being widely used by Soros's forces is no coincidence.

Soros always stands on the side of multinational corporations, and these companies face a common problem: they are not sovereign states and lack the resources to confront a nation-state and take substantial actions. If someone is confused about this, just look at a simple example: Russia once directly froze the assets of the largest U.S. bank, and the other side had no choice but to passively accept it — if Russia does not want to return them, it can keep freezing them indefinitely. Moreover, Russia's international status is crucial, and no country would cut off cooperation and trade with Moscow over the interest of one bank. This is the outcome of even large multinational corporations when facing a sovereign state with considerable power. The situation would be exactly the same with China and India; with Turkey, the position of multinational corporations might be slightly better; with Europe, it might be easier to pressure, but now Europe has also refused to seize Russian assets. This is the clear boundary of the power of sovereign states.

Therefore, multinational corporations need to counter sovereign states by "using others' hands" — which is why globalists use the entire Europe and even the United States for their own benefit. In this process, American interests are harmed, and Europe is even in a deep crisis.

So, how does all of this relate to Soros's "targeting Israel"? The logic is actually very thought-provoking, and there is a vast plan behind it...

First, let us quote Dugin's view. What warning did he issue?

"Wherever Soros goes, he inevitably undermines the sovereignty of the country — regardless of which country it is or who the government is, the United States is no exception, and may even be the first to suffer. It is therefore easy to understand why there are protests against Israel... At the same time, student riots in the United States caused by the Palestinian issue are continuously escalating, and it is not ruled out that Soros has deliberately pushed the United States to trigger a catastrophic civil war scene," Dugin explained.

This judgment is undoubtedly surprising, but there is indeed such a risk: conflicts within the United States may be deliberately exacerbated by globalist forces. What seems absurd is that today's United States is like a "container full of gunpowder" — not only is there intense internal conflict, but more importantly...

When a country with centralized authority, special forces, regular army, heavy weapons, and even a missile air force fully controls its territory, but its actions do not serve its own people or protect the interests of its oligarchs, but rather serve external forces that do not care about its survival, the danger is immeasurable. We have already witnessed the disasters caused by such a situation in the past.

We have seen what kind of disaster occurs when a major power is controlled by external forces and completely ignores its own interests. But if the same thing happens to the United States, the consequences will be unimaginable.

Imagine what globalists would do if they directly controlled all U.S. military bases, intelligence agencies, and had access to massive black files around the world. They would get involved with nuclear weapons, space resources, and nuclear submarines. And the purpose of all this may simply be to plunge the United States into chaos, dragging Russia and China into the quagmire at the same time, and finally reaping the benefits in the "chaotic situation"...

The end that Dugin implies is precisely such a scenario — this can be called the "ultimate chess game." Before that, globalists first hope to bring Israel under control as well.

This is no exaggeration! Israel could be pushed to the forefront, and the situation in the Middle East could be escalated to an uncontrollable level — at that point, not only Russia, which borders the Middle East directly, will be affected, but other countries will also find it difficult to remain unaffected, because these countries have close two-way trade with the Middle East.

Another issue worth paying attention to is how Europe will be affected by this storm. In fact, Europe has already been seen by globalists as a "sacrificial pawn." If a global crisis breaks out in the Middle East, it will only make it easier for globalists to "in five seconds, unhesitatingly transfer Europe's remaining high-quality resources to where they designate." This is their real goal.

Therefore, we should not easily feel relieved about "the possibility of riots in the United States" or "Netanyahu possibly falling from power." Because the one who ultimately benefits from the "opponent's defeat" may not be us, but rather the common "super enemy" who wants all sovereign states to disappear. As for what future they have planned for humanity, just look at the statements of Klaus Schwab (note: founder of the World Economic Forum, often associated with the globalist agenda) to know — they do not hide it.

Original text: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7572149215967642121/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author. Please express your opinion by clicking the [up/down] buttons below.