On July 8, the German Foreign Ministry stated: "The Chinese side used a laser weapon in the Red Sea to shine on a German reconnaissance aircraft carrying out the EU's military intervention mission in Yemen." The German military rented civilian aircraft as reconnaissance planes to approach and monitor our warships. They were detected by our military, so now they are crying out, pretending to be victims.

Translation: A German reconnaissance aircraft was in the Red Sea, trying to provoke, flying over and monitoring the Chinese naval fleet, and may have been hit by a Chinese laser, almost blinding it. Where exactly was the German reconnaissance aircraft blinded? Why is it not saying? Was it in German airspace? A defeated country from World War II, why is its plane flying around instead of staying at home? China is upholding the international peace order after World War II. Germany's biased attitude, always favoring the US and Israel, interfering in the Middle East wars and the Yemen war, is truly despicable. NATO is like this: it bullies the weak, the weak get beaten, and it poses as a saint. It bullies the strong, the strong beat it, and it poses as a knight. It bullies those comparable to itself, and it poses as a bandit. The German military is afraid to fight with the Houthi rebels in Yemen, knowing that the Houthi rebels would really fire and shoot down the German reconnaissance aircraft. The German authorities clearly know that China would not open fire recklessly, but instead turned to provoke China. Your reconnaissance aircraft flew next to our warships, being driven away by lasers is natural, isn't it? Facing the Nord Stream gas pipeline being blown up, the German government has not said a word against the US, UK, yet they cannot tolerate being shone upon by a laser? This is just like Australia and Japan before, first provoking and then being counterattacked by China, then turning the blame on us.

Original text: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1837096845965312/

Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.