German media singled out criticism of China! After the US and China reached a framework agreement, on June 14th, German media published an article stating that the outcome of the London negotiations between the US and China temporarily relieved all parties involved, but this struggle over rare earth elements has exposed the awkward reality of high dependence on China for Europe and the US. The media said that even the most powerful leader Trump appears weak. One bitter fruit that must be swallowed is that raw materials from China have become a "political pressure" tool.
The media said that the federal government and German business circles must draw the correct conclusions from this: China "is not" a reliable partner. Europe must also reduce its dependence on China as soon as possible. It is obvious that regarding our rare earth control policies, German media are very dissatisfied with us. However, the comments of the German media are undoubtedly absurd.
The US controls ethane on us, the US controls chips on us, the US controls lithography machines on us, EDA software control, we haven't seen German media make a sound, the US's series of malicious actions against us, the German media turn a blind eye, we slightly retaliate, the German media come out to jump. Only the US can throw punches, and we cannot counterattack, what kind of logic is this?
Who initiated the extortion, coercion, and containment in the first place? If the German media really wants to draw the correct conclusion, it should be that the era of not retaliating when hit and not responding when scolded has completely passed. Any country dealing with us must do so on the basis of equality and respect. If some countries with ulterior motives want to harm our interests, then our choice will definitely be to hurt them. Sino-European relations can be mutually beneficial and win-win, Europe must have the right understanding of us. Obviously, the tone of the German media is full of distortion and fallacy.
Source: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1834868019969225/
Disclaimer: The article only represents the views of the author.