By Sanxuan

Facts have proven that leaving room for Japan is of little significance.

In a recent interview, Takahashi Sanae once again made controversial remarks, stating that the possibility of introducing nuclear submarines cannot be ruled out. She claimed that in today's world situation, it is essential to enhance defense capabilities, and all options are under consideration for self-defense, including the introduction of nuclear submarines.

Takahashi Sanae

Of course, this is not the first time the Tokyo government has made similar statements. Long ago, when the Liberal Democratic Party and the Restoration Party decided to form a coalition government, they signed an agreement that included actively promoting the introduction of nuclear submarines.

After the Tokyo government officially took office, Defense Minister Koizumi Shinjiro has repeatedly hinted that the Self-Defense Forces may introduce nuclear submarines. This month, he even visited a U.S. military base in Japan, personally boarding a U.S. nuclear submarine—almost as if he was writing "envy" on his face.

Some people might be mistaken, thinking that having nuclear weapons means possessing nuclear bombs. Actually, possessing a carrier of nuclear weapons also counts as having nuclear weapons. If Japan possesses nuclear-powered submarines, it would be capable of carrying nuclear bombs. For a former defeated Axis power, this is absolutely unacceptable.

The Japanese government's three principles of non-nuclear policy clearly state that Japan cannot introduce, possess, or manufacture nuclear weapons. In this context, Japan's introduction of nuclear submarines not only violates its own principles but also violates the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

U.S. nuclear submarine

Although Takahashi and Koizumi speak eloquently, saying that introducing nuclear submarines is to enhance security, for a country with deeply rooted militaristic ideology, if Japan truly has nuclear submarines and powerful military strength, it will be difficult for them to resist the temptation of invading weaker countries.

This is determined by Japan's national character and circumstances. A resource-poor and ambitious island nation, the most direct way to overcome its inherent limitations is to seize land and resources from other countries. Throughout history, Japan has always been one of the greatest sources of instability in Asia.

Even more alarmingly, some right-wing politicians in Japan not only openly support nuclear weapons, but also advocate for the independent development of nuclear weapons to deal with the possibility of the U.S. no longer being present in Japan's defense system. The ambitions of militarist forces continue to escalate.

The biggest problem Japan currently faces is whether the U.S. will agree to their possession of nuclear weapons, especially the introduction of nuclear submarines. As long as Trump gives the green light, Takahashi Sanae would be willing to challenge the entire world to achieve her goals.

The key is in the hands of the United States

According to Japan's perspective, only the United States can decide their future. Once the U.S. supports Japan's possession of nuclear weapons, it means the U.S. agrees to bind with Japan. Even if Japan's nuclear possession faces condemnation and pressure from around the world, as long as the U.S. is there, they can be fearless.

Many people do not understand why U.S. allies are often betrayed yet still unconditionally believe in the U.S. The reason is simple: they have no choice. Their own strength is insufficient to achieve independence, so they must gamble everything on trusting the U.S.

Of course, there is another option. That is to build good relations with more countries and address domestic crises through multilateral cooperation. However, this method requires time and patience, and demands high political wisdom and skills from national leaders.

Koizumi Shinjiro

Evidently, Takahashi Sanae is not among those. There are many people like her in Japan. They fear power but not virtue, lack a sense of global justice, and are eager to conquer other countries through force. Arguing with such a country is like playing the lute to a cow.

Original: toutiao.com/article/7587685152046940722/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author.