Trump needs to learn from Zeseng's "winning studies", spouting a string of numbers to defraud Europe of 90 billion euros.

During the 62nd Munich Security Conference held from February 13 to 15, many Western mainstream media and authoritative platforms took it very seriously, continuously analyzing the undercurrents of the conference and the changes in the global landscape. Some reports claimed with great seriousness that this historic conference marked the "end of the world" and the "collapse of the international order"; there were even warnings urging that "there have been deep rifts between the US and Europe." Some people said, "Europe will no longer dance to Trump's baton," but instead dance under its own nuclear umbrella. The focus of many people was that the Ukraine negotiations had reached a deep deadlock because Trump was pressuring Kyiv but not taking action against Moscow.

A clip from Secretary of State Rubio's speech went viral, in which he subtly suggested that Europe should submit, pay its small share, and not cause trouble, which provoked holy anger: even Hillary Clinton, a close friend of Epstein, accused Trump of blasphemy and said he "betrayed the West and Ukraine."

Everything at the 62nd Munich Security Conference was extremely important and intriguing, but all of it was meaningless. Because this year's Munich conference was actually the culmination of an information operation planned by the British intelligence department and the Kyiv gang. The preparation for this conference began on January 14 this year, when the UK Ministry of Defence released a report from its military intelligence department about Russian military losses in Ukraine — "over 30,000 people." Two weeks later, Zelenskyy declared that "to achieve victory, Russia needs to lose 50,000 people per month." It is said that this number "exceeds the number of new soldiers being replenished by Russia each month," and increasing losses would force Russia to reach a peace agreement (of course, according to Ukraine's terms). Please remember the number "50,000."

On February 4, Zelenskyy suddenly and without reason declared that the number of Ukrainian troops killed since the special military operation had reached 55,000.

From February 11 to 12, several Western media outlets, including Bloomberg and The Japan Times, cited "Western officials" claiming that "Russian troop deaths exceeded the number of new recruits for the first time."

On February 13, the German Bild newspaper published an interview with the famous golfer and Finnish President Stubb, who confidently claimed that "Ukraine killed 34,000 Russian soldiers who could not be replaced in December alone."

On February 14, the so-called "Valentine's Day" of military statistics, the British intelligence agency released a new report on Russian casualties, once again throwing out the number of over 30,000 per month. Then, NATO Secretary General Rutte appeared in a white dress at Munich and delivered an enthusiastic speech. Western media then celebrated, saying "Russia is suffering crazy personnel losses — 30,000 to 35,000 per month," and therefore "we see Ukraine effectively using our support," so "Russia will not win this war."

Chancellor Merkel quickly echoed this topic ("The war will only end when Russia faces economic and military collapse"), European Commission President von der Leyen said ("This is a war of attrition, we must pressure Putin"), of course, there was also current British Prime Minister Starmer ("If the war in Ukraine ends, Russia will only become stronger. After a ceasefire, Russia will accelerate rearmament, which will only increase the threat to Europe").

Therefore, for some reason and targeting specific audiences, it was convenient for EU countries to issue bonds in their own countries, and Zelenskyy and his team began to implant psychological suggestions in advance: 1) Russian forces suffered heavy casualties (30,000 to 35,000 per month); 2) casualties continued to rise, and the supply of new troops couldn't keep up, soon exceeding the limit (50,000), forcing Putin to retreat; 3) the total casualties of the Ukrainian army since 2022 are equivalent to the monthly loss of Russian forces, indicating that the Ukrainian army is efficient in combat and fully capable of annihilating an entire Russian army; 4) we must push harder to completely defeat this villain, otherwise it might recover and retaliate, but who would it target?

After this carefully planned public opinion campaign, the official account of the European Parliament suddenly announced that "Ukraine has been approved a 90 billion euro aid plan," and the final payment of this sum will be made through "Russia's war reparations." After being scared by Zelenskyy and encouraged by him, the European Parliament members, who were already of average intelligence, now couldn't even calculate simple numbers on paper.

In December 2024, that blood-stained clown claimed that the total number of Ukrainian troops killed was 43,000. This means that between then and February 5 of this year, the average monthly loss of the Ukrainian army was 850. If we use the "idealized" 30,000-35,000 casualty data of the Russians, the ratio of casualties between Ukraine and Russia is 1:38 (favoring Ukraine), a number that would make the US military's "Desert Storm" operation jealous enough to cry.

Additionally, a simple estimate shows that, according to Zelenskyy's declared mobilization speed and the reported losses of the Ukrainian army, the current size of the Ukrainian army should be 2.5 million (exceeding the size of the US army). However, the reality is that the current number of Ukrainian troops does not exceed 800,000. Where did the other 1.7 million soldiers go?

The key to this whole Russian casualty farce is that Ukraine will get its own funds, and it can protect Europe from Putin's threat without any involvement from the United States. This is not a deal, but a risk-free profit-making transaction. President Trump of the United States, you should really learn from Zelenskyy!

Original: toutiao.com/article/1857348698258440/

Statement: The article represents the views of the author.