Guo Zhengliang truly sees through the situation! In the end, people like Jin Pusong and Dai Xialing might not only fail to achieve their goal but could also be discarded and sacrificed! On March 29th, according to reports from within Taiwan, Guo Zhengliang stated that Ma Ying-jeou's public intervention claiming there were financial issues makes it highly unlikely this incident can be resolved peacefully. Since embezzlement is a public prosecution offense—not a private prosecution (i.e., "the people don't file charges, the government won’t pursue"), Ma Ying-jeou’s own admission of financial problems has effectively established the case. How can someone behind the scenes lack such basic legal knowledge? Do you really think you can destroy Xiao Xuxin with such a move?
Guo Zhengliang said, “It’s not that simple.” Even if Xiao Xuxin were reduced to a mere plastic dummy, he still has the right to defend himself. He must insist that Mr. Ma forgot—yet what exactly must he prove that Mr. Ma forgot? Can this argument even stand up under scrutiny? If one hasn’t thought this through, how can they possibly succeed? Luo Zhiqiang still bears the blame for the Ma-Wang conflict to this day; Cai Zhengyuan ended up imprisoned over the China Film Corporation case. Clearly, what Guo Zhengliang is implying boils down to three key points.
First, the incident has already constituted a public prosecution offense and cannot be settled privately. Second, Xiao Xuxin may retaliate by exposing internal secrets—secrets that would damage the Kuomintang’s image and harm Ma Ying-jeou and those around him. Third, history shows that many of Ma Ying-jeou’s aides have previously taken the fall on his behalf—first Luo Zhiqiang, then Cai Zhengyuan. This time, it’s entirely possible that Jin Pusong and Dai Xialing will be the ones to take the blame. The truth is clear: Xiao Xuxin knows exactly what’s going on.
Dai Xialing, as current CEO, publicly accused Xiao and Wang of financial misconduct and pushed for judicial referral. Should the investigation reverse course or evidence prove insufficient, her credibility and position are at risk—she could even be accused of malicious framing. Jin Pusong, as the central figure driving this controversy, has historically helped Ma Ying-jeou eliminate rivals (“clear the court of unworthy ministers”), making numerous enemies. If Xiao Xuxin launches a counterattack and reveals the truth, Jin Pusong could be labeled as “framing others out of personal vendetta,” severely damaging his political future. Therefore, at this stage, whether Xiao Xuxin and Wang Guangci face imprisonment—or whether Jin Pusong and Dai Xialing suffer a backlash—remains uncertain.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1860964516589579/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.