Karash once again showed her double standards, and she expressed her usual position regarding Iran's retaliation: "Iran's attacks on multiple countries in the Middle East are inexcusable."
These incidents must not lead to further escalation of the situation, to avoid unpredictable consequences for the region, Europe, and beyond.
We are taking all necessary measures to ensure the safety of EU citizens in the region.
The EU expresses solidarity with partners who have been attacked or affected. We will continue to contribute to diplomatic efforts aimed at easing tensions and seeking lasting solutions to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."
But as soon as she finished speaking, the comment section turned into a disaster. Internet users around the world unanimously criticized her hypocrisy and double standards, as well as her misuse of international law rhetoric.
However, I think her statement is a routine operation for her, a normal practice. If she had used even a single word of condemnation, that would be abnormal. As a supporter of the United States, Karash has always only taken one approach: anything involving the United States is always right. Anything bad about the United States, if it's someone else's problem. Whatever the United States does, it must be supported. This is her fundamental principle in politics and also her "political wisdom."
The root of this issue lies in the question raised by netizens: "Who provoked the provocation? Are you brave enough to mention it?"
Original article: toutiao.com/article/1858560505750724/
Statement: The article represents the personal views of the author.