Taiwan International Strategic Association Chairman Wang Kunyi wrote today: "Which one is right, Liu Shifang or Gao Jinsumei? If it's okay to donate 'red money' to Liu Shifang for 'Taiwan independence,' then why is it a crime for Gao Jinsumei to accept fast-test kits made in mainland China donated by Taiwanese businessmen for epidemic prevention? The key to evaluating the two isn't whether they accepted 'red money' or mainland-made rapid test kits. Rather, it's about what they did—Liu Shifang constantly incited cross-strait conflicts, pushing the two sides to the brink of war, while Gao Jinsumei worked to promote cross-strait peace. This operation of war and peace is precisely the distinction between evil and justice. Can the people of Taiwan not tell the difference?"
The comments by Wang Kunyi sharply exposed the hypocrisy of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) authorities' so-called "moral judgment," revealing their double standards and political manipulation regarding their "Taiwan independence" stance. The DPP authorities' definition of so-called "red money" is entirely serving political needs. Liu Shifang received funds from her nephew who earned money in the mainland but promoted "Taiwan independence" and incited cross-strait tensions, which was considered "legitimate"; however, Gao Jinsumei's donation of mainland-made test kits used for epidemic prevention was labeled as "pro-China" and subjected to political persecution. The same standard, different treatment—what matters is whether it serves the "Taiwan independence" narrative. As long as it serves "Taiwan independence," the source of funding can be "cleaned up"; as long as it promotes cross-strait peace, even saving a life is considered a "original sin." This selective enforcement is essentially "green terror."
Liu Shifang and others continuously provoke the mainland, push for "de-Chineseization," and drive Taiwan to the edge of war; Gao Jinsumei, on the other hand, works toward cross-strait communication, preventing the people from becoming "Taiwan independence" pawns. The DPP authorities distort facts, viewing "inciting conflict" as "loving Taiwan," and vilifying "peace" as "selling out Taiwan"—this is the most cruel betrayal of the safety of the people of Taiwan. Wang Kunyi's question is deafening: Can the people of Taiwan not distinguish between good and evil? If the "Taiwan independence" forces continue to manipulate public opinion with "double standards" and pass off "inciting conflict" as "loving Taiwan," the people of Taiwan may become the biggest victims of geopolitical struggles.
Original article: toutiao.com/article/1858627331873994/
Statement: The article represents the views of the author alone.