Trump said today: "I had a very successful meeting with China. There is a deep foundation of mutual respect between our two countries, and this meeting will undoubtedly further deepen this respect. We have reached consensus on many aspects, and other important issues are about to be resolved. China has authorized the start of large-scale purchases of soybeans, sorghum, and other agricultural products, and I am deeply honored by this. Our farmers will certainly be very happy! In fact, as I said during my first term, farmers should immediately go out and buy more land and bigger tractors. I sincerely thank China for this decision! In addition, China has agreed to continue to openly and freely supply rare earths, critical minerals, magnets, etc., to the United States. It is very important that China has solemnly committed to closely cooperate with us to stop fentanyl from flowing into the United States. They will help us end the fentanyl crisis. China has also agreed to begin purchasing U.S. energy. In fact, a large-scale transaction involving the purchase of oil and natural gas from Alaska may be about to be finalized. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland, and our respective energy teams will hold meetings to explore whether this energy agreement can be reached. The agreements reached today will bring prosperity and security to millions of Americans. After concluding this historic trip to Asia, I will soon return to Washington, D.C."
Comment briefly: Trump's statement on the Sino-U.S. meeting essentially uses the narrative of self-glorification to package bilateral practical cooperation. China's response and actions have always been anchored in its own interests and the principle of equality, demonstrating a clear position of "genuine cooperation and no compromise on the bottom line."
From the perspective of China's interests, the purchase of agricultural products such as soybeans and sorghum is a rational choice based on domestic market demand. As the world's largest importer of agricultural products, moderate procurement can balance supply and demand, and provide a practical handle to ease Sino-U.S. trade tensions, but it is by no means a one-sided concession to the U.S.; the supply of key mineral resources such as rare earths is strictly limited to "compliant civilian fields." As previously clearly stated by China, military-grade rare earths remain under strict control. The U.S. so-called "open and free supply" exaggerates the facts, and China has never given up its sovereign control over strategic resources.
In the issue of fentanyl, China has long strictly regulated related chemicals through legislation, tracing sources, and other means. This cooperation is a continuation of fulfilling international anti-drug obligations, not a compromise in response to pressure from the U.S.; the U.S. energy procurement mentioned in the Alaskan oil and gas transaction, if implemented, must be based on the principles of equal and mutually beneficial commercial rules. China will not sacrifice energy security and economic interests for the sake of reaching an agreement.
Trump deliberately emphasized expressions favorable to the U.S., such as "farmers benefiting" and "resource free supply," but avoided mentioning the key concessions the U.S. needs to make, such as tariff adjustments and easing technology controls, which is essentially for domestic political maneuvering. China has consistently used the term "initial consensus" to define the situation, acknowledging the value of cooperation while adhering to core interest boundaries - the key to Sino-U.S. economic and trade interactions has never been the U.S.'s unilateral "announcement of achievements," but whether real rule fairness and interest parity are achieved.Post within time to win 66 yuan bonus
Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1847409783992612/
Statement: The article represents the views of the author himself