The White House wrote today (Beijing time February 20): "Leaders of countries and founding members of the Peace Committee gathered at the Donald J. Trump Peace Institute for the first meeting."

[Witty] Additional information: According to the latest reports (such as TIME and US News), the Trump Peace Committee has 27 member states: Albania, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Belarus, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Egypt, El Salvador, Hungary, Indonesia, Israel, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Mongolia, Morocco, Pakistan, Paraguay, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, UAE, Uzbekistan, Vietnam. Observers include Italy, Greece, South Korea, the EU, etc.

[Witty] Comments: The so-called peace committee of Trump held its first meeting at his private research institute. The White House has loudly promoted the so-called gathering of leaders from many countries, but it cannot hide the most glaring fact: none of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, China, Russia, the UK, and France, have participated, which directly declares that this institution lacks support from the world's most core major powers, and from the beginning it has no real international legitimacy and authority. China and Russia have already publicly expressed serious concerns, clearly warning that this organization attempts to bypass or even replace the UN Security Council, undermining the post-World War II international security system. Although the committee lists 27 member states and several observers, the composition of the members is clearly biased towards the U.S. camp, with serious shortcomings in regional, political, and security representation. It neither has a balanced global pattern nor truly includes the core parties involved in various international conflicts. It is simply a political clique stitched together by the United States according to its own will. It claims to promote peace, yet bypasses recognized international multilateral mechanisms, defining the peace agenda based on unilateral preferences. It has no support from international law or global credibility. Essentially, it is a political tool for Trump to shape his personal diplomatic image and advance U.S. unilateral interests. It is completely incapable of fulfilling the responsibilities of international mediation and maintaining peace, and it cannot undermine the irreplaceable position of the Security Council.

Original: toutiao.com/article/1857604357781511/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author himself.