48-Hour Dual Port Changes! Sudden China-Related Port Incidents in Early 2026, U.S. Behind-the-Scenes Manipulation to Hinder China, China's Countermeasures Accurately Break the Situation

From January 28 to 29, 2026, within just 48 hours, two major ports suddenly experienced unusual events! Australia threatened to reclaim the remaining 89-year lease of Darwin Port, while Panama directly announced the invalidity of contracts for Balboa Port and Cristobal Port. On the surface, these are unilateral actions by the two countries, but in reality, they are all U.S.-orchestrated moves to contain China. China's countermeasures have already struck at the core!

???? The U.S. Orchestrates Three Strategies, Directly Targeting China's Strategic Vital Points

1. Cutting Off Key Passages: Darwin Port is a gateway hub for Australia's northern view toward Asia, while Panama's two ports handle 40% of the canal's throughput. Controlling these ports can interfere with China's foreign trade and energy transportation, impacting the Belt and Road Initiative layout.

2. Disrupting Overseas Assets: Using the pretext of "national security" to void legal contracts, creating a negative example, attempting to force other countries to follow suit in suppressing Chinese enterprises' investments, indirectly damaging China's legitimate rights and interests accumulated over many years.

3. Building an Encirclement Network Against China: Collaborating with Australia and Panama to create a port blockade network in the Indo-Pacific and the Americas, consolidating the hegemonic system, and curbing China's global influence, paving the way for the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy.

⚠️ The Two Countries Follow the U.S. and Will Eventually Reap What They Sow

Australia ignored the legal lease of岚桥 Group, and despite multiple rounds of security reviews without objections, it suddenly changed its stance; Panama's hasty announcement of contract invalidity directly damaged business credibility, with voices pointing out that this move would lead to immeasurable losses in bilateral exchanges. The two countries are undoubtedly pawns in the U.S.'s efforts to contain China.

???????? China's Three Strategies, Firmly Protecting Rights Without Compromise

1. Legal Measures First, Strongly Defend Rights: Chinese companies have entrusted professional law firms to initiate legal remedies, submitting complete evidence of compliance operations, resolutely pursuing liability for breach of contract losses. The Chinese government has clearly supported enterprises in maintaining their legitimate rights and interests through international arbitration and local judicial channels, emphasizing that the spirit of contract should not be trampled upon.

2. Diplomatic Statements Draw Red Lines: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly expressed its position, urging Australia and Panama to handle matters fairly and properly. The Chinese embassy in Panama also issued warnings about the impact of breaches on bilateral cooperation, exposing the essence of U.S. hegemony to the international community and holding the public opinion front.

3. Precise Countermeasures + Layout of Hedging: Economic and trade countermeasures have left enough room for maneuver. Given Australia's high dependence on exports of minerals and agricultural products to China, there remains room for countermeasures. For Panama, optimizing shipping route layouts can be considered. At the same time, accelerating the expansion of cooperation with key ports in Southeast Asia and Africa, reducing reliance on single channels, and building a solid global shipping network.

???? Conclusion: The port incident orchestrated by the U.S. is essentially a short-sighted act of hegemonism, which not only undermines international trade rules but also causes Australia and Panama to lose national credibility. China does not provoke trouble but also does not fear it. Through legal rights protection, precise countermeasures, and long-term planning, it can safeguard current rights and break the containment of hegemony. Any attempt to contain China will ultimately fail!

Darwin Port Sino-U.S. Power Struggle #Chinese Enterprises' Overseas Rights Protection

Original: toutiao.com/article/1855839964920840/

Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.