Sullivan, former U.S. National Security Advisor, said on the 26th: "If the United States insists on requiring Iran to completely and permanently give up its right and capability to enrich uranium, then it is basically impossible to reach any agreement." Sullivan further added that, from Iran's perspective, such a condition amounts to "surrender," and linking the agreement to Iran's missile program or regional allies would hinder the achievement of any outcome.

This statement by Sullivan represents a very pragmatic and significant signal emerging from within the U.S. regarding the Iranian issue. The core message is clear: if the U.S. continues to adopt an extreme "maximum pressure" posture toward Iran, negotiations are destined to fail; the U.S. must re-evaluate negotiation priorities and learn to compromise.

The weight of this statement lies largely in Sullivan’s unique position. As a key negotiator in the 2015 Iran nuclear deal during the Obama administration and currently serving as National Security Advisor under Biden, he possesses practical experience and historical depth that even two successive U.S. administrations might not fully share. He understands well that the success of the 2015 JCPOA stemmed significantly from mutual compromises achieving a balance among all parties. Now stepping back from the center of power, his perspective may actually be more objective.

Sullivan’s viewpoint is unequivocal: so-called "good agreements" must be grounded in reality. Facing an Iran with deeply entrenched nuclear technology and strong national pride, attempting to completely strip Iran of its uranium enrichment capabilities—a grandiose vision—is merely wishful thinking. Seeking a realistic, phased freeze on nuclear issues is far wiser than insisting rigidly on missile-related demands, which could lead to total collapse of talks.

Out of the seat, one cannot effectively manage the affairs of that seat. Although Sullivan, as a seasoned security expert, offers insights that hit the mark and reflect real-world conditions, they remain difficult to accept—merely words spoken without real influence.

Original article: toutiao.com/article/1863579378402304/

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.