On December 15, the EU's beautiful foreign minister, Kallas, made a statement on the official account "EU in China," stating the following points: first, condemning China's recent dangerous actions in the South China Sea; second, reiterating that the 2016 arbitration ruling has finality; third, calling on and hoping that China maintains restraint. This beautiful foreign minister has never changed her habit of "lying with open eyes." First, the Philippine personnel threatened Chinese staff with knives, but Kallas said nothing about it; second, even the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea denied involvement in the South China Sea arbitration case, so how can this 2016 arbitration ruling have finality? Third, China has been very restrained, because we have always followed the principle of "not firing the first shot." Is it because the U.S. stated that it would stand with the Philippines, so the EU immediately took sides?
Original article: toutiao.com/article/1851620341568777/
Statement: The article represents the views of the author.