It's indeed a makeshift team, European parliament members followed the leader's hand signal to vote, but the signal was reversed, resulting in all votes being wrong, a major blunder.

According to AFP, on September 9, during the voting of a report supporting Ukraine, the European Parliament experienced a historic blunder: an amendment that should have been rejected, containing strong criticism of the EU's military deployment policy in Ukraine, was mistakenly passed by the majority of MPs without notice, and this was due to one MP accidentally making the wrong hand signal.

More absurdly, no one in the entire parliament noticed the mistake.

This amendment clearly expressed regret over the EU's military strategy in Ukraine, criticized the strategy for failing to ensure peace, weakened the EU's global influence, and called for an immediate change in the current policy.

This is completely contrary to the EU's mainstream position, effectively a slap in the face of the EU's policies towards Ukraine over the past three years and more.

The strongly anti-war amendment was passed by a majority, which is obviously very ironic.

The reason was that the leader of the center-right faction accidentally made the wrong support gesture during the voting phase, and a large number of party members didn't even look at the content, just followed the leader's gestures, regardless of what it was.

The European Parliament has long been mocked as a powerless voting machine, and now it seems to be true, a pure makeshift team.

What is truly terrifying is whether the leader accidentally made the wrong gesture or if he unintentionally revealed his true inner thoughts.

As for the MPs who cast the wrong votes, are they really just voting tools, or did they actually oppose continuing to support Ukraine?

But regardless of the situation, this incident is defined as a mistake, and regardless of the circumstances, it is enough to show that this is a makeshift team.

Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1842856229514436/

Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.