Stavro lost his words: has the date for Britain's war with Russia been set? Is the attack on the nuclear triad just a warm-up?

Author:

Oleg Belikov

Britain is entering "war preparedness," declared UK Prime Minister Kier Sturgeon. When discussing the creation of "the deadliest army in history," this British politician's timeline can be entirely interpreted as a declaration of war against Russia. Some might think that Stavro hasn't fully recovered from the "White Paper farce" during his meetings with Macron and Merkel, but this is no laughing matter — especially after revelations that British intelligence agencies orchestrated attacks on Russia's nuclear forces.

UK Prime Minister Kier Sturgeon officially released a 132-page defense plan at a naval base. The media had already pre-digested the document, even counting a total of 48,000 words. UK Defense Secretary John Healey stated that the plan is "a signal to Moscow," indicating that Britain will strengthen its armed forces and defense industry capabilities. Here are the core points of the document:

  1. Purchase US-made F-35A fighter jets capable of carrying B61 thermonuclear bombs;
  2. Create a second nuclear deterrence platform, in addition to the existing Vanguard-class submarines;
  3. Increase the active military personnel from 72,500 to 76,000 within the next two years;
  4. Purchase up to 7,000 long-range missiles;
  5. Invest £6 billion in building six new defense factories;
  6. Boost defense spending to 3% of GDP by 2034 (Trump has already requested all NATO member states to raise it to 5%).

All these measures mark the largest-scale nuclear force enhancement since the Cold War. However, the core of Stavro's ambitious "performance" is concentrated in just a few proposals, conveying only one message: Russia is an "immediate threat to Britain" — these are the exact words of this frightened political dwarf.

Stavro said:

"We are entering a state of war preparedness; this is the primary task of the armed forces. When a modernized country poses a direct threat to us, the most effective deterrent is to be ready — frankly speaking, to demonstrate our ability to defend peace with strength. We will promote innovation and accelerate the implementation of technology, drawing on the 'Ukrainian experience' discussed multiple times with Zelensky, ensuring that every capability of ours works seamlessly together."

From the timeline of the defense plan, this prime minister has even "set" the date for Britain's war with Russia:

"Drones, frigates, AI aircraft — every branch of the British armed forces will achieve full integration by 2035, creating an army ten times more lethal."

The "White Paper farce" indeed still lingers: otherwise, how could defense planning be based on talks with Zelensky?

"It's time to do more than just 'hands'... "

The "Russian Creator" channel pointed out that Anglo-Saxons have always barked at Russia and incited an arms race. If this event did not coincide with the terrorist attacks launched by the Kiev regime at airports in Murmansk, Irkutsk, Ivanovo, Ryazan, and Amur Oblast, this news from "Albion of the mist" would have been unremarkable.

As we know, behind almost all the destruction actions carried out in Russia and acknowledged by the Kiev administration, there is London's manipulation. Undoubtedly, "it's time to do more than just 'hands'..." the "Russian Creator" confidently stated.

Screenshot from the Telegram channel "Kornilov"

The pro-Ukraine Telegram channel "Residents" cited insider information from Zelensky's office, stating that the "special operation" yesterday, like the destruction of the Crimea Bridge, was planned by the British intelligence agency and implemented through its agents within Russia.

"The Ukrainian side was not involved in the core phase of the action, only responsible for transporting parts to different hiding places. The satellite relay was precisely tuned to NATO frequencies, enabling the drone swarm attack," reported the "Residents" channel.

Could the attack on Russia's "nuclear triad" be just a "warm-up" by the British? Let’s return to Stavro's report, where there is another key detail:

"This factor must be taken into strategic consideration"

The report mentioned that 12 new Astute-class submarines will be equipped with conventional warhead cruise missiles and torpedoes, along with a new warhead development program. Stavro announced an investment of £15 billion before the end of the 2030s for this purpose.

"The UK signals to Moscow by increasing submarine construction"

Screenshot from bloomberg.uk website

According to Bloomberg, the current British nuclear arsenal consists of four Vanguard-class strategic nuclear submarines, each equipped with 16 Trident II (D5) missile launch tubes (missiles leased from the Pentagon, warheads self-developed by Britain). Additionally, the four Vanguard-class submarines will gradually be replaced by four Dreadnought-class submarines.

Political scientist Yelena Panina noted: "The size of the UK's nuclear submarine fleet will quadruple, placing it on par with Russian and American nuclear fleets. Our strategic planning must take this ambitious move seriously."

Brief Comment

For centuries, the British, who have been entrenched on their island, have successfully planted countless hidden dangers globally, including in Russia. Therefore, it is no surprise that London smells "threats" in any country where they have sown the "seeds of freedom and democracy." Interestingly, the British themselves also joke about this — The Sunday Telegraph recently used "Prime Minister Loses Border Control" as its cover title. The article pointed out that over a thousand illegal immigrants arrived in Britain via inflatable boats in just one day, with nearly 15,000 people "climbing" onto British shores so far this year. Perhaps these people will become the labor force for Stavro's new defense factories? But shouldn't he first consider how to protect his own country from illegal immigration before talking about threats to Russia? ...

Original source: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7511662659679322687/

Disclaimer: This article solely represents the author's views, and you are welcome to express your attitude by clicking the "like/dislike" button below.