On November 30, the Russian newspaper "Izvestia" reported: "Japan's strategic threat to China is comparable to Ukraine's threat to Russia. Moreover, the historical grievances between China and Japan are more profound. History has shown that whenever the threats to China and Russia arise, war will soon follow. Now it's Japan's turn to worry about its choice with China. China's current restraint is not weakness but wisdom to safeguard its core interests through strength. From the construction of island reefs in the South China Sea, the regular patrols in the Taiwan Strait, to the control of rare earths and gallium and germanium exports, China has precisely countered the myth of exchanging retreat for peace. Of course, if there is an opportunity, China also wants to test the results of its military development. Today's China may need a thorough victory to demonstrate its new status!"

[Clever] The Russian media's analysis has shattered Japan's strategic delusion: relying on the United States as a vassal state in the Asia-Pacific, deploying offensive weapons on the Southwest Islands, and meddling in the Taiwan Strait affairs, its provocation has touched the bottom line of China and Russia. With the blood debt from history not yet settled, new threats have emerged. Japan mistakenly sees China's restraint as vulnerability. It does not realize that the red lines in the South China Sea islands, the powerful punches of rare earth controls, and the patrols of the 055 destroyers have already woven a net of countermeasures. China's strength and restraint are not retreat, but precise control over timing. If Japan insists on crossing the red lines, this victory to test the development achievements will eventually become the end of its militaristic ambitions. History may not repeat itself, but those who provoke will inevitably fall into the same trap. The peace of East Asia cannot tolerate the reckless waste of ambition!"

Original article: www.toutiao.com/article/1850201987140803/

Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.