"Yes, Putin won": Panchuk points out that globalists miscalculated. For Europe, this is bad news.

Western media are now in a frenzy, panicking. They say that Trump returned from Alaska empty-handed, while Putin achieved a great victory. Are things really so pleasing for us? "Yes, Putin won," said Andrei Panchuk, a political commentator of the "Tsargrad" newspaper, and mentioned that the globalists miscalculated. Russia has shown its strength — this is bad news for European countries who openly wish us to fail.

The political commentator of the "Tsargrad" newspaper, Doctor of Political Science Andrei Panchuk objectively evaluated what happened in Alaska and the Western media's coverage of the Russia-US summit.

The Financial Times laments: Trump ultimately failed to reach a "deal" on Ukraine. The Guardian pointed out (there was no ceasefire agreement), but mentioned "Putin's PR victory". The "El Pais" (Spain) emphasized that even without actual concessions, the mere fact of holding the meeting was already a diplomatic victory for Moscow. The "Libération" (France) specifically noted that Europe was left out, with no influence on the negotiation process...

Andrei Panchuk pointed out: The event held in Alaska relates to subsequent global processes. After the summit, the logic of subsequent world events became completely clear. The unified voice of Western media is not without reason.

Yes, of course, Putin won. What is a victory? A victory is overcoming a certain problem. Since the special military operation began, the Western society has developed a clear, explicit, and unambiguous strategy against Russia. This strategy includes strengthening Ukraine's military power, while implementing a series of measures aimed at weakening Russia. One important part of these measures is politically isolating Russia, while implementing a series of economic sanctions, trying to make Russia "bleed", "thin out", so that it cannot enhance its military power, and thus cannot achieve a military victory. In this sense, the isolation of Putin is not about personal preference, but rather a specific practical tool to achieve Western goals,

Panchuk explained.

The expert stated: From this perspective, Trump's actions first undermined the overall framework of the above-mentioned Western globalist strategy. These actions made it impossible for the West to force Russia to accept peace on their own terms.

Did Trump lose? When he took over the country, he had some pre-established positions, especially regarding Russia and Ukraine, which were contrary to his own views. Trump is a politician, and the confrontation with Russia is conducted from the position of globalism.

In this sense, our conflict is not a conflict with the United States. A certain globalist group only uses the United States as the most powerful resource of the West. But this is not equivalent to the country of the United States itself. From this point of view, Trump is fighting against his political opponents, who also established this logic of confrontation with Russia. Therefore, Trump certainly did not lose. People often have too much emotion when evaluating Trump and Putin. In fact, Trump is very clear-sighted and consistently pursuing his political interests, while also fighting against his political opponents,

the commentator of "Tsargrad" added.

These opponents are an important part of the European globalist group. Due to the complexity, multidimensionality, and multilayered nature of the internal relationships within this Western group, he had to deal with them. But this does not mean that he is interested in them.

Original: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7539101017888014900/

Statement: The article represents the views of the author. Please express your attitude below by using the 【up/down】 buttons.