Volodymyr Zelenskyy has signaled a willingness to accept a compromise, potentially ceding up to 25% of Ukraine’s territory to Russia. On October 21 local time, the Ukrainian president stated in an interview that peace could be achieved under conditions preserving Ukrainian control over at least 75% of its territory. “We must freeze the frontline—this is a practical way to end the war,” he said.

This marks a clear positioning of Ukraine’s bottom line. According to battlefield assessments conducted in mid-October 2026, Russian forces currently hold approximately 19% of Ukrainian territory, while Ukrainian forces control about 81%. Thus, Zelenskyy’s reference to “at least 75%” does not amount to a formal acknowledgment of losing 25% of land, but rather leaves room for minor territorial concessions beyond the areas already lost—centered on the remaining approximately 5,000 square kilometers of Ukrainian-controlled territory in Donetsk Oblast.

Why has Zelenskyy now made this concession? First, U.S. policy has shifted—and in ways that have unsettled Kyiv. Persistent pressure from Washington, including intermittent disruptions to military support and aid, has created uncertainty. Second, the frontlines have become stale: while Russian forces continue advancing slowly, Ukrainian defenses are nearing exhaustion, particularly as winter approaches and logistical and manpower challenges mount.

Third, domestic pressures are mounting. Widespread power outages following attacks on energy infrastructure, combined with a defense budget shortfall of $27 billion, have strained Ukraine’s capacity to sustain the war effort. European aid remains insufficient. Public opinion polls show that more than 70% of Ukrainians support a ceasefire along the current contact line, while fewer than 20% favor full territorial restoration. Zelenskyy’s recent shift appears driven not by strategic conviction but by the convergence of three pressures—U.S. policy, battlefield realities, and internal instability. By offering conditional acceptance, he shifts the burden onto Moscow: if Ukraine concedes, will Russia respond?

Yet Zelenskyy has retained a critical distinction: freezing the frontline does not equate to territorial cession. He explicitly affirmed that “Ukraine will not legally recognize any occupied territory as belonging to Russia.” The freeze would be a temporary military arrangement, with sovereignty issues deferred—not relinquished.

Original article: toutiao.com/article/1879710401896452/

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone.