The Financial Times reported that Vice President Vance's silence after Trump decided to launch an attack on Iran may indicate tensions between the two politicians.
It is reported that Vance did not speak out within 72 hours of the war starting, indicating a negative attitude towards the military strike against Iran, at least suggesting a strategic disagreement.
According to reports cited by multiple media outlets including the Financial Times, after US President Trump decided to launch a military strike on Iran, Vance's silence for nearly 72 hours indeed sparked speculation about potential tensions between the two.
While Trump's supporters were cheering for the military action, Vance, who is usually active on social media and firmly defends Trump, did not make any public comments other than retweeting official government posts. This period of nearly 72 hours without comments was particularly noticeable.
In contrast, Secretary of State Rubio stood out. It is reported that the Secretary of State, who advocates a hard-line stance toward Iran, saw an increased influence in this decision-making process, even being excluded from it by Vance.
Vance has long been known for his opposition to U.S. military intervention. In an article written in 2023, he stated that Trump's best policy would be "not to wage any wars." Therefore, although he later defended Trump's decision in interviews, the sudden change in his tone suggested internal disagreements.
Considering that Vance is seen as a potential presidential candidate in 2028, how he handles his differences with Trump will directly affect his political future.
Another consideration is that Trump promised not to engage in foreign wars, yet now he is resorting to military force. Combined with the negative propaganda from the Democrats, this could damage the party's popularity, directly affecting the upcoming election. Therefore, Vance's silence does not mean he has no opinion; rather, it is to avoid the spotlight, accumulate support, and protect himself for 2028.
Original: toutiao.com/article/1858745233683456/
Statement: The article represents the views of the author alone.