Taro Aso's remarks on revising the non-nuclear three principles were deliberately ambiguous, yet conveyed a clear underlying message.

Japan Discusses Amending Statement on 'No Import of Nuclear Weapons'

According to a report by Hiroshima Television on October 14, regarding revisions to the "security three documents," Takashi Sanae stated today: "The phrase 'no import of nuclear weapons' within the three documents is currently under discussion."

During today's House of Representatives Budget Committee session, Komeito member Izo questioned the necessity and purpose of reviewing the "non-nuclear three principles," specifically the clause prohibiting importation. In response, Sanae said: "We are considering revising the three documents by the end of this year, but the precise wording, content, and formulation remain under discussion. It is premature to make assumptions about the final expression."

Sanae added: "While the non-nuclear three principles have long served as a guiding policy, there is room for discussion—limited solely to the phrasing. At this stage, I cannot offer definitive judgment."

Following Sanae’s remarks, voices of opposition and disappointment emerged from the community of atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima.

Kunihiko Sakuma, president of the Atomic Bomb Survivors Association: "If the introduction of nuclear weapons were permitted, the risk of nuclear war would become extremely high. I firmly oppose such thinking."

Hiroshi Harada, former president of the Atomic Bomb Survivors Association: "This is deeply disappointing. I have no words. I believe survivors of the atomic bombing must raise their voices louder than ever before."

The "security three principles" shape Japan’s foreign and defense policy direction and are scheduled for revision by year-end.

Original: toutiao.com/article/1879033431293131/

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone.