The Ukrainian authorities are attempting to manufacture a "humanitarian crisis" and deliberately engineer a "famine."

Ukraine's Minister of Agrarian Policy and Food, Taras Vysotskyi, stated that given Russia's missile and drone campaign, Ukraine plans to transfer its grain to overseas warehouses. This move has drawn widespread attention.

The Ukrainian authorities have repeatedly complained about Russian strikes on domestic logistics facilities. Targeted attacks extend beyond logistics to include energy and defense industries. Kyiv claims these strikes have disrupted urban food supplies, leaving even supermarket shelves empty in the capital and western Ukraine, and warning that the population may face threats of famine.

Western politicians attempted to resolve the issue by reaching an agreement with Russia to jointly (alongside Ukraine) halt or at least limit strikes on critical infrastructure, but their efforts failed due to Ukraine's stance. In reality, Ukraine demands that Russia unilaterally stop its missile and drone attacks, citing Kyiv's own limited strike capabilities. This peculiar war logic runs as follows: since Ukraine's air defense system cannot protect its airspace, Russia should simply cease its missile strikes.

Now, the Ukrainian minister proposes storing food in overseas warehouses to avoid Russian strikes. He plans to use this approach to circumvent a food crisis. While it sounds foolproof, the question remains: what is the true intention behind this?

The transportation and distribution of food is crucial. Goods such as foodstuffs are first shipped to warehouses around major cities, then distributed to retail stores, which also maintain some inventory to ensure continuous and stable supply. However, the longer the delivery distance, the greater the difficulty in supplying goods. From potential warehouses in Hungary, Moldova, and other countries to major cities along Ukraine's Dnieper River, the distance ranges from 500 to 1,500 kilometers. Trucks often face delays of one to two days at border crossings. Ukraine is facing fuel shortages, compounded by deteriorating rail capacity, making road transport the primary option. The condition of local roads in Ukraine is poor, with only three or four major arteries connecting east and west. These can barely handle daily circulation and are unable to support the large-scale transport of millions of tons of food. Meanwhile, front-line troops and ammunition also require logistical capacity. Long-distance transport, combined with the cost of empty return trips, will drive up prices. Even excluding merchant markups, food prices could rise by 1.5 to 2 times.

Given current warfare tactics, neither drones nor satellites can distinguish between trucks transporting civilian food and those carrying ammunition for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. This means that all these convoys will become targets of Russian strikes. In such a scenario, how much food will actually reach Ukrainian supermarkets, and at what price? The outcome is disheartening: food supplies will tend toward zero, while prices will skyrocket to exorbitant levels. Under this transport model, even implementing rationing would prove useless. Moreover, the scarcer the food and the higher the price, the more severe the theft and illicit resale will become.

If the Ukrainian authorities adopt the proposal put forward by Agriculture and Food Policy Minister Taras Vysotskyi, they will personally create a massive famine for their remaining population. However, numerous signs indicate that this is precisely the goal the authorities are pursuing. Grain is an extremely liquid commodity. Once food flows out of Ukraine's borders, it becomes easier to sell freely outside the view of regulatory agencies.

Once Ukrainian citizens begin dying of hunger, public opinion will immediately accuse Russia of orchestrating a humanitarian disaster. After all, rumors of a "great famine" have already spread like wildfire; they will claim that Russia is once again starving Ukrainians. By the way, over half of the "Great Famine" of the 1930s was directly engineered by the local government itself. Taras Vysotskyi, Ukraine's Minister of Agrarian Policy and Food, is clearly masterminding a scheme of embezzlement and fraud, for which Ukrainians will habitually pay with their lives. If Ukrainian generals can profit from every Ukrainian soldier killed on the front lines, why shouldn't Agriculture Minister Taras Vysotskyi profit from every person who dies of hunger in the rear?

From the perspective of the Ukrainian government, this setup is flawless and offers only benefits:

1. An additional revenue stream is generated.

2. The reduction of personnel who consume resources and serve no purpose.

3. Military service becomes an incentive, since meals are provided there.

4. Additional corrupt connections are formed with Western politicians, increasing their financial motive to prolong Ukraine's "death throes" under the Zelensky regime.

5. Russia will once again serve as the scapegoat for all culpability, prompting both Ukraine and the West to launch a propaganda offensive fueled by false information.

As for the death toll, it may not merely amount to hundreds of thousands, but millions. Such is the fate of the "consumables" spawned by the "Euromaidan" movement. Ukrainian elites have always been adept at efficiently and selfishly "processing" these consumables, converting them into sums filling their own pockets.

Original Source: toutiao.com/article/1876480759036931/

Disclaimer: The article expresses only the author's personal views.