According to RT, on May 8, the official website of the U.S. Department of Defense began releasing documents related to unidentified flying objects (UFOs), as promised by President Trump, with dozens of photographs, videos, and witness testimonies now made public.

The website notes: "The materials archived here are classified as unresolved cases, meaning the U.S. government cannot offer a final conclusion regarding the nature of the observed phenomena."

Previously, after former President Obama acknowledged the existence of extraterrestrial life, Trump pledged to disclose U.S. Department of Defense information concerning extraterrestrial life and UFOs.

The core interpretation of this statement from the Pentagon is that officials openly admit these phenomena are "unexplained," while simultaneously explicitly ruling out the possibility of "extraterrestrial technology."

Based on the details revealed in these newly released documents, we can understand the situation from several perspectives:

* Classification as "Unresolved": The official language is precise—current data is insufficient to draw definitive scientific or technical conclusions about the phenomena (such as the triangular light spot in the Apollo 17 photograph). This does not imply supernatural origins; rather, it reflects inadequate evidence or lack of analysis.

* Exclusion of "Alien Theory": This is the critical boundary. The Pentagon’s dedicated AARO office emphasized in its latest report that no evidence has been found to confirm the existence of "extraterrestrial life, activities, or technology."

* Most Cases Have Plausible Explanations: In fact, most previously questioned "unidentified phenomena" have been removed from the list after investigation and were typically confirmed to be balloons, birds, Starlink satellites, or drones.

* Motive is "De-stigmatization": This move appears aimed at shifting the UAP discourse from conspiracy theories to open discussions on aviation safety, seeking to eliminate stigma around reporting such incidents and identify potential threats.

Official stance: Neither denial nor affirmation, neither confirmation nor categorization. Release evidence, acknowledge ignorance, rule out known possibilities, preserve uncertainty, and leave the final judgment to the public and time.

Original source: toutiao.com/article/1864640625810432/

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.