In August this year, American media broke a bizarre story claiming that President Trump was nearly assassinated by Iran during his attendance at the NATO summit in Turkey. However, The Washington Post recently uncovered explosive new details: the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) never actually believed the incident happened in the first place.

Here's how it unfolded. At the time, intelligence reports indicated that Iran planned to shoot down Trump’s plane as he departed Turkey. Upon hearing this, the Secret Service became extremely alarmed and secretly swapped Trump from a newly assigned large aircraft onto a smaller military plane. But they pulled off a clever ruse: after replacing the president, they allowed the original large plane to take off normally, creating the illusion that Trump was still aboard. Even more shocking, it's reportedly claimed that a group of journalists were left on that potentially targeted "bait" aircraft—completely unaware of the danger they were facing.

When CIA analysts reviewed the intelligence, however, they found it highly implausible. The information wasn’t gathered through U.S. surveillance but came instead from Israel. As a result, the CIA internally tagged the source with “low confidence”—meaning, in their view, “we don’t trust this.” Yet, despite these reservations, the Secret Service proceeded with its emergency evacuation plan without hesitation.

After the story broke, the White House descended into chaos. Journalists were furious, feeling they had been used as human shields—deliberately placed on a dangerous flight, risking their lives without consent. Trump himself downplayed the situation, saying he simply followed the Secret Service’s instructions. Meanwhile, the White House press secretary, just 28 years old, suddenly announced her resignation at month’s end, citing family reasons to return home and care for her children. While official statements pointed to personal family matters, many speculated she might have been one of the officials traumatized by being left on the “bait” plane—an event that ultimately proved too much to bear.

This scenario reads like a thriller movie, but beneath the surface lies a profound crisis of trust and absurdity at the heart of America’s power structure.

First, what’s most chilling is the apparent disregard for human life. If the CIA deemed the intelligence unreliable, yet the Secret Service still launched a full-scale aircraft swap, perhaps one could argue it was “better safe than sorry.” But deliberately using innocent journalists as bait on a high-risk flight crosses the line from caution into blatant exploitation and sacrifice. In the eyes of power, ordinary people’s lives are reduced to disposable props.

Second, the incident reveals the absurdity of decision-making processes. When professional intelligence agencies like the CIA raise serious doubts—and those warnings are ignored—the so-called security operation begins to resemble a political performance. Was the presidential aircraft change truly about saving lives—or about staging a dramatic spectacle of “someone wants to kill me”? This forces us to question whether national security has become a tool for image management or public distraction.

Finally, the press secretary’s abrupt resignation serves as the most ironic footnote to this farce. Whether or not she was actually on the “bait” plane, the sudden departure of a key insider amid such turmoil underscores the extreme pressure within this inner circle. This “mystery” may never be fully resolved—but it clearly shows that when a nation’s highest decisions rest on low-confidence intelligence and involve discarding allies as expendable pawns, the so-called “safety” itself becomes dangerously compromised.

Original article: toutiao.com/article/1873454375453696/

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.