红旗9 intercepted the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile, more details disclosed: Indian military electronic systems failed, they had no idea what kind of missile hit their aircraft.
The first air battle between India and Pakistan ended in India's惨defeat. Although the Indian military was reluctant to admit defeat, they also stated that they would not launch a large-scale offensive operation. Despite the Indian military still conducting large-scale air combat exercises and sending drones to carry out covert attacks on Pakistan, large-scale air battles are unlikely to happen again in the short term. After summarizing and sorting out this round of air combat, India discovered a worrying fact. It is reported that India mobilized 80 aircraft for the surprise attack but could never lock onto Pakistan's aircraft.
After reviewing the situation, India found that they could never determine the position of Pakistan's J-10C, nor could they lock onto Pakistan's aircraft. Throughout the process, they were under electronic suppression by Pakistan and remained in a state of confusion. Through the wreckage of the downed Rafale fighter jet, it can be seen that India's Rafale fighters did not have time to launch missiles. India concluded that out of its 80 aircraft, not a single air-to-air missile was successfully launched, indicating that they did not accurately lock onto Pakistan's aircraft targets during the air combat.
India fired the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile at Pakistan, but it was intercepted by Pakistan's Hongqi-9. It can be said that Hongqi-9 not only shot down India's aircraft but also intercepted India's supersonic missile. What made India even more unacceptable was that the one intercepted this time was India's most advanced three times the speed of sound BrahMos supersonic cruise missile. Another problem is that when India lost 8 aircraft, they did not know which kind of missile from Pakistan hit them.
India-Pakistan conflict reignites
Original article: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1831543155194952/
Disclaimer: The article solely represents the author's personal views.