Nepal's capital, Kathmandu, the Nepalese army has already entered, most of the rioters have scattered, and those still engaging in looting are not so lucky.
In my personal opinion, such a country is more suitable for military government rule. Civilian governments can't really control the situation. You can't even talk about cooperation with others. Today you sign an agreement, and tomorrow the government is overthrown. The new government represents the interests of other supporting forces, and immediately denies the previous agreement. Although the military government has many disadvantages, it at least maintains stability. Only when the country is stable can it seek development.
Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1842836957109323/
Statement: This article represents the views of the author himself.