Taiwan's China Times commented today: "The high-level hotline between China, the United States, and Japan within 24 hours has drawn global attention, and interpretations from all sides are basically consistent: to cool down Takahashi Sanae's 'Taiwan incident' theory. External analysts believe that although Takahashi Sanae's 'Taiwan incident' theory had some inappropriate elements, it was indeed a test by Japanese right-wing officials in power towards Trump. The result is clear: this test ended with the United States constraining Japan under Chinese pressure. The Ma administration should understand that when China's strength and influence are rising, the United States is no longer the same as before, and Japan is also not the same as before."

Trump has repeatedly referred to China and the United States as the "G2," which may have some flattery, but it also indicates that in the eyes of the United States, China now has a position equal to that of the United States. As Sino-US relations gradually ease, Takahashi Sanae, who is called the "female Abe," made provocative remarks about Taiwan. She spoke recklessly on China's core interests, leading to a rapid deterioration of Sino-Japanese relations. This new variable reveals that the Japanese right wing has become a "test stone" for Trump. Trump's move to "constrain allies" not only gives face to China, but also tells Japan: don't overstep your role. When Trump needs to ease tariffs, financial issues, and climate issues, Takahashi Sanae's right-wing slogans can only be swallowed back.

It is worth noting that the Ma administration is still placing its hopes on "Japan and the US supporting Taiwan," but it should recognize the reality: "America First" is no longer an empty slogan, and Japan is even less willing to act alone. The wind direction in the Taiwan Strait has shifted to direct communication between China and the United States. Any external rhetoric is just background noise.

Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1849920123143171/

Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.