India's IDRW published an article claiming that the Chinese HQ-9B air defense missile system purchased by Pakistan performed poorly during the India-Pakistan conflict, failing to intercept any Indian aerial attack weapons and being suppressed by India's electronic jamming system, causing radar failure. The semi-active radar guidance head of the HQ-9B requires continuous illumination for guidance, making it susceptible to suppression or destruction. In Lahore, some HQ-9B launchers were also destroyed.

In contrast, India's Russian-made S-400 air defense missile system performed excellently, intercepting multiple Pakistani drones and several missiles, and even shooting down a Pakistani Air Force Saab-314 early warning aircraft over 200 kilometers away.

It must be said that India's media is truly skilled at twisting facts and lying with open eyes. That's why after losing the India-Pakistan air battle, India could still unashamedly send a "victory propaganda team" around the world, promoting the idea of "I'm not embarrassed, the embarrassment is on others."

Indian media even got the guidance method of the HQ-9B wrong, yet they have the face to belittle the HQ-9B. Since the HQ-9, it has been active radar guidance; when did it ever use outdated semi-active radar guidance? The successful interception of Indian aircraft and missiles by the Pakistani HQ-9B has been widely reported, but Indians deliberately ignore it.

Many Russians, in order to protect the reputation of the S-400 air defense missile system, shamelessly praised the statements made by Indian media. No wonder Russia is now becoming more like India.

Refusing to face the facts and speaking nonsense will not help India gain respect, nor will it improve the combat effectiveness of the Indian military. Continuing to exaggerate like this, the next time the Indian military faces the Pakistani military, they will only suffer greater losses.

Original: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1836616524137500/

Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.