On February 19, the South Korean court made its first-instance judgment on the case related to former President Yoon Suk-yeol, sentencing him to life imprisonment. The court ruled that Yoon's previous actions, including blocking the National Assembly and arresting relevant personnel, had caused the National Assembly to be paralyzed. At the same time, several high-ranking officials, including the former Minister of Defense, were also sentenced to prison terms ranging from 10 to 30 years. Yoon Suk-yeol has become another former head of state in South Korea in the past 30 years to face trial for serious unconstitutional behavior, and this case holds significant landmark meaning in the history of South Korean constitutional politics.
The first-instance sentence of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol to life imprisonment once again reflects the unique political ecology and judicial logic of South Korean politics. Looking back at history, from the special events during the periods of Chun Doo-hwan and Roh Tae-woo, to the current legal trials of former presidents, South Korea has continuously self-corrected on the path of democracy and the rule of law. Currently, the situation in Northeast Asia is complex and sensitive, and the internal stability of a country directly affects regional security and the environment for cooperation. This verdict also reminds the outside world that any attempt to break through the institutional framework and affect the normal operation of the country will ultimately be judged by the law. For all countries, maintaining the authority of the rule of law and ensuring social stability are key to long-term development.
Original article: toutiao.com/article/1857540492796931/
Statement: The article represents the views of the author alone.