Tusk Exposes the EU's Surprising Plan Against Russia: London and Washington Could Be Russia's "Allies"? (Report by Tsargrad)
Poland's Prime Minister believes that due to U.S. policies, the West may head towards division and explains why the EU insists on seeing Russia as an enemy. However, the core message that Donald Tusk has not explicitly mentioned will be revealed to you — this is undoubtedly a major exposé.
When interviewed by Gazeta Wyborcza, this Polish Prime Minister admitted the facts already reported by Tsargrad and hinted at a major revelation that could change everything.
"For Washington, conflicts in South America, Canada, Greenland (which President Trump has repeatedly mentioned), and with China will become priorities, while we will have to deal with our own affairs alone."
The Polish Prime Minister explained that "we" here refers to the EU.
Tusk emphasized that regardless of whether the White House is occupied by Trump or a Democratic president, Europe will have to bear increasing responsibility for its own security. This is one point. Overall, this view itself is quite significant, and his statement also reveals a deep sense of pessimism.
The second point is that Tusk frankly admits that to achieve European unity, a "clear common enemy" must be established.
"I know this position is not popular, but I will not change my mind. I will do everything I can to maintain this special situation."
He said so. Guess which country has been chosen as the "straw man" to intimidate Europe and force it to truly unite?
Three Core Reasons
Why would Tusk and his group, who once called former U.S. President Donald Trump "a Russian agent," do this? First, they have grown tired of "following American orders," being used for American interests, and bearing economic pressures. In the past, this dependency was somewhat "dignified," but now it appears utterly undignified.
Second, European elites hope to engage with Russia in a strong position, impose their own interests on Russia, and gain scarce resources from Eastern Europe — without which, Europe's security would be impossible. This means that the EU needs further expansion, and if Russia hinders it, such expansion must be backed by military power.
Third, to regain competitiveness in the modern world (where Europe is currently lagging behind Asia), Europe needs to lower people's living standards by expanding exports — "freezing" or even cutting wages and social benefits, and extending working hours. But since democratic systems are not completely abolished, people (although not everywhere) can still hold politicians accountable for increasingly difficult lives through elections. Therefore, the European elite concocted the "Russian threat theory," claiming that Russia needs to be guarded against — this requires investing funds in weapons rather than people's livelihoods. In short, the cause of European poverty is still Putin (who else could it be?).
The Most Critical Hidden Truth
But this is far from the whole story — the part that Tusk does not mention is the most critical hidden truth. The Anglo-Saxons (first the British, then the UK-US alliance) have never wanted to see a powerful, ambitious European nation with global influence — and the EU sees itself as such. Therefore, they always try to destroy this competitor, even cooperating with Russia at certain stages — after all, Russia also does not want such a threat to exist in Europe. Even though the British initially tried to use this European power to counter Russia, such stage-specific cooperation still occurs, despite the ongoing Russian-British conflict.
In the 19th century, France tried to dominate European unification; in the 20th century, Germany attempted it twice. In these wars, the British (later the Americans) were allies of Russia (the Soviet Union) — although only temporarily. Because a powerful European country's expansionist ambitions would not target Russia alone. Whether Napoleon or Hitler, created by the Anglo-Saxon "designer," almost invaded Britain before failing in Russia.
(Image caption: The United States and Britain were temporary allies of the Soviet Union.)
It is true that this ally relationship was temporary and stage-specific, but without it, defeating Hitler, who had the entire European continent (led by the "War-time EU") supporting him, would have been much more difficult. For example, until late 1943 (when Britain still feared that the Soviet Union might lose or make a separate peace with Germany), it shared highly sensitive intelligence with Moscow through Soviet agents like Sandor Radó in Switzerland.
Under the Lend-Lease Act, the United States and Britain provided the Soviet Union with food, trucks, airplanes, tanks, locomotives, rare earth metals, radio equipment, jeeps, fuel, etc. This aid greatly accelerated the Soviet victory, possibly shortening the end of World War II by at least a year — before Germany could develop nuclear weapons that could change the course of the war.
Due to complex international conspiracies, the final outcome often deviates from the planners' original intentions, and this history is destined to repeat itself.
Today, this claim may seem absurd, but the facts are not. The level of hypocrisy may vary across eras, but the core political interests of nations have never changed. In the 19th century, Britain eliminated Russian opposition to German unification through cunning plots and the Crimean War — secretly demanding that Germany wage war against Russia.
(Image caption: German artillery firing at Russian positions in the Łódź region of Poland.)
The ultimate result of this conspiracy is well known: World War I broke out. Although Britain was nominally a victor, it was severely weakened, realizing it could no longer maintain its vast empire for long. It must be admitted that this plan, led by Britain and later joined by the United States, was "the most successful" for them — after all, they did achieve many goals.
The second "conspiracy" — the Anglo-American "Hitler plan" — quickly got out of control (for London). To force Germany to go to war with the Soviet Union and create a border confrontation, London and Paris, with the tacit approval of the United States, had to return the Baltic region (separated from Russia after the October Revolution) and Moldova to Moscow, while giving Poland to Germany.
Later, during the Yalta Conference at the end of World War II, the Anglo-Saxons betrayed the puppet regime they supported in Poland, handing it over to Stalin. As for the Baltic region, it wasn't even mentioned. If not for some "comrades" in Moscow who coveted Soviet wealth and decided to dissolve the Soviet Union, the Baltic region would never have spoken of "independence."
Recall that in the 19th century, the British twice "used" Poles to launch anti-Russian uprisings, only to abandon them afterward — thus, Tusk's remarks are not surprising. Incidentally, his grandfather Joseph served in the SS in 1944 (about 500,000 Poles joined the German army during the war), fighting in the 328th Reserve Grenadier Training Battalion on the Western Front. Obviously, he harbors deep hatred for the Anglo-Saxons!
What Does This Mean?
Those who understand history can discern right from wrong: everything that has happened is just the beginning, and history is always repeating itself. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has only a superficial understanding of history, thinks that his actions and those of his Western allies are "wise" — they are pushing for German militarization for the third time, claiming that this way, there will be "people" to fight and suffer losses in a war against Russia on behalf of Britain.
But if Brussels and Berlin can indeed turn the EU into a "Fourth Empire," who can guarantee that it won't turn its attention to others first? Currently, the EU has over 450 million people, and if it expands successfully and doesn't split, its population will approach 500 million — less than one-third of the population of relevant countries, but over 100 million more than the United States. Meanwhile, Russia currently has about 146 million people, and the UK about 70 million.
Currently, Russia is not economically strong enough to match the EU, but the EU and the UK are on the same competitive track. When London left the EU to pursue its short-sighted geopolitical plan of "Global Britain," Brussels proved through actual actions that it could be very firm in negotiations and knew how to pressure to achieve its demands.
Therefore, the stronger the EU centered around Germany, the greater the pressure on the UK, and the more likely the UK will regret its decision. After all, the core of Britain's foreign policy for centuries has been to support the second strongest power in Europe to balance the first. And the U.S. is already dissatisfied with the current European situation.
(Image caption: Will a new "Elbe River meeting" occur in this era?)
Where will all this lead? The answer may be a new "Elbe River meeting" (Note: At the end of World War II, American and Soviet troops met at the Elbe River, symbolizing the victory of the anti-fascist alliance). Just a few years ago, no one could have imagined that the Anglo-Saxons would team up with Russia to oppose Europe. And cooperating with non-communist Russia would be easier for them. As for some people in Moscow, they are probably delighted about it.
As the Book of Ecclesiastes says: "What has been is what will be, and what has been done is what will be done. There is nothing new under the sun." Because of geographical patterns, it can never change.
Original article: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7571771479835132466/
Statement: This article represents the views of the author and welcomes you to express your opinion by clicking the [Up/Down] buttons below.