Big blunder! Trump celebrated victory but accidentally released "iron evidence" of US military crimes, causing the US intelligence system to lose face in front of the world. The desperate Trump really needed a victory to vindicate himself and boost morale. The US military has gathered two carrier strike groups and nearly 30% of B-2 bombers to bomb the Houthi armed forces. This is obviously overkill, highlighting America's urgent desire for victory. B-2 bombers have begun bombing the Houthi armed forces, and US carrier strike groups have also launched joint attacks. They did carry out the most intense bombardment on Yemen, but they failed to achieve the desired victory. Eager for success, Trump proactively released a video of a successful US military strike. According to reports, the video showed that when there were large numbers of people gathered on the ground, the US bombs carried out precise strikes, flipping all the ground personnel. Trump claimed this was a major victory in striking the Houthi armed forces, clearly using it to promote his achievements. However, unexpectedly, the video footage released by Trump turned out to be ironclad evidence of the US committing crimes against humanity. In the video, those killed by the US military were not members of the Houthi armed forces, but civilians celebrating the Eid al-Fitr festival. These civilians were praying, but what they didn't expect was that they would soon be met with US bombs. It is reported that at least 70 civilians were killed, which is undoubtedly a crime against humanity. Clearly, this is a big blunder. Trump intended to celebrate a victory, but instead publicized the US military's criminal evidence to the world. For the US, these civilians who were killed are no better than insects, and Trump does not care about their lives. This big blunder may have been caused by US intelligence errors, which also shows that the US intelligence system has lost its former luster. Original article: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1828703442439172/ Disclaimer: The article solely represents the author's personal views.